Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Filip Peliwo vs Ivan Gakhov Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Peliwo vs Gakhov analysis and find out who is favored!
Filip Peliwo vs Ivan Gakhov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Peliwo has won 51.46% of points on his second serve, while Gakhov has won 46.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Peliwo, in recent form, has won 53.33% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gakhov has won 47.29%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.97% and 28.27% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Peliwo has saved 55.15% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gakhov has saved 64.1% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Peliwo has won 55.56% of matches played (W/L 40/ 32), with Gakhov winning 38.78% (W/L 19/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Peliwo has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 92/ 65), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5). Gakhov has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 400/ 229), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Peliwo has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.83% of matches (W/L 30/ 17), where as Gakhov has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45% of matches (W/L 18/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Peliwo winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Peliwo winning 2 and Gakhov winning 0. The last match between Peliwo and Gakhov was at the Yokohama Challenger, 26-02-2019, Second, Hard with Filip Peliwo getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:41.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Peliwo and Gakhov have played a deciding set 0 times, with Peliwo winning 0 times and Gakhov 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Peliwo winning 0, and Gakhov 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Peliwo has played against opponents with an average rank of 149.97 while Gakhov has played against players with an average rank of 268.02.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Peliwo has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gakhov has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Peliwo has converted 46.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gakhov has converted 47.52% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Peliwo 1 - 0 Gakhov
458
Rank
161
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
280
Rank
142
High
27
Age
L
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
56% (396-307)
Career Total W/L
61% (462-294)
53% (9-8)
YTD W/L
33% (6-12)
$50,555
Career Prize Money
$56,825
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Filip Peliwo | Ivan Gakhov |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:41 | 1:16:41 |
| 1st Serve % | 75% (42/56) | 75% (55/73) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (30/42) | 56% (31/55) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (7/14) | 39% (7/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (4/12) | 17% (1/6) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (35/73) | 34% (19/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Filip Peliwo
Player
Ivan Gakhov
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
75%
(
55 of
73)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Filip Peliwo | Ivan Gakhov |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (9/8) | 33% (6/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (20/16) | 40% (16/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (165/170) | 48% (193/211) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 36% (5/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.44 |
| Aces Total | 30 | 87 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.34 |
| DFs Total | 28 | 68 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:51 | 1:47:43 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 198.88 | 236.28 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (613/1049) | 59% (786/1337) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (397/613) | 70% (551/786) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (231/436) | 46% (256/551) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (43/88) | 49% (43/88) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (399/1009) | 36% (458/1258) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (4/4) | 38% (6/10) |
| Futures W/L | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (9/17) | 35% (6/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 20% (1/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (9/9) | 75% (8/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (9/0) | 25% (8/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 0% (10/0) |
Filip Peliwo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Filip Peliwo
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Amr Elsayed
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Filip Peliwo
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
7
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
0
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
29%
(
10 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
39 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Filip Peliwo
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Seydina Andre
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Menelaos Efstathiou
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Filip Peliwo
47%
(
38 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
93)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
65%
(
28 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
100
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Matthew William Donald
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
7
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Filip Peliwo
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
9
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ivan Gakhov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Ivan Gakhov
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Ivan Gakhov
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
114)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
114)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
4
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Ivan Gakhov
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Dennis Novak
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Ivan Gakhov
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
40 of
51)
71%
(
25 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
26%
(
22 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Ivan Gakhov
52%
(
54 of
104)
1st Serve %
62%
(
72 of
116)
8
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
4
83%
(
45 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
50 of
72)
48%
(
24 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
35 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
46 of
116)
115
Total Points Won
105
|
6-3 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriele Pennaforti
Player
Ivan Gakhov
61%
(
70 of
114)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
98)
5
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
5
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
41 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
112
Total Points Won
100
|
5-7 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Ivan Gakhov
52%
(
14 of
27)
1st Serve %
56%
(
14 of
25)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
9 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
31
Total Points Won
21
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Peliwo Vs Gakhov Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
