Felix Gill vs Tommaso Compagnucci Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent months, Gill has secured 45.07% of points on their second serve, slightly outperforming Compagnucci's 43.18%. Is a superior second serve a reliable predictor of success in this match? Historically, yes.
• Turn to return stats: Gill has captured 44.62% of points on opponents' second serve, while Compagnucci edges ahead by winning 46.51% of these points.
• Considering first serve returns, Gill has succeeded in 29.76% of these points, falling short compared to Compagnucci's 33.97%. Does this give Compagnucci an advantage in the matchup? Absolutely, especially in return games.
• Under pressure, Gill has successfully thwarted 48.28% of breakpoints, whereas Compagnucci has managed 44.68%. How crucial is this in anticipating live betting performance? It's a key indicator of a player's resilience.
• Over the past year, Gill has observed a 59.09% win rate in matches, while Compagnucci has a more favorable record with 70.15% victories.
• On clay, both thrive, however, Gill holds a marginally better success rate at 64% compared to Compagnucci's 60%.
• In the less prestigious Futures/Satellites/ITF circuit, Gill won 64.86% of matches in the past year, compared to Compagnucci's superior 74.6% win rate.
• Rival's skill level appears comparable, with Gill facing an average-ranked opponent of 373.36, closely followed by Compagnucci's 373.99.
• If the match ventures into a deciding set, Compagnucci holds the upper hand, with a remarkable 67% win rate compared to Gill's 38% in such scenarios.
• Considering break point opportunities, Gill converts 36.73%, while Compagnucci has a more efficient 44.59% conversion rate, giving Compagnucci the edge in critical game moments.

Editorial Prediction (June 13, 2025, UTC):

In this impending contest, both players show substantial strengths and similar weaknesses. Gill's steadier second serve performance stands out, yet Compagnucci demonstrates superior skill in returning games, particularly crucial first serve returns.

Compagnucci also maintains a higher win rate in recent matches and shows resilience in converting break points. These factors combine to depict Compagnucci as more adept under pressure, likely contributing to a better performance in pivotal match moments.

While both players excel on clay, Compagnucci's ability to thrive in deciding sets and higher win rate suggest a readiness for high-stakes situations.

Thus, analyzing the data and patterns, Compagnucci emerges as the likely winner in this upcoming tennis match.