Federico Gaio vs Marc Polmans Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gaio vs Polmans analysis and find out who is favored!
Federico Gaio vs Marc Polmans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gaio has won 49.58% of points on his second serve, while Polmans has won 45.74%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gaio, in recent form, has won 48.08% of his opponent's second serve points, while Polmans has won 52.08%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.02% and 31.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gaio has saved 59.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Polmans has saved 63.3% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gaio has won 45.61% of matches played (W/L 26/ 31), with Polmans winning 53.62% (W/L 37/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gaio has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 323/ 248), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 5/ 9). Polmans has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 92/ 67), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 12/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Gaio has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.92% of matches (W/L 23/ 25), where as Polmans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.94% of matches (W/L 27/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gaio winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gaio winning 2 and Polmans winning 0. The last match between Gaio and Polmans was at the Nottingham 2 Challenger, 15-06-2021, First, Grass with Federico Gaio getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:49:1.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gaio and Polmans have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gaio winning 0 times and Polmans 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Gaio winning 1, and Polmans 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gaio has played against opponents with an average rank of 263.32 while Polmans has played against players with an average rank of 304.71.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gaio has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Polmans has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gaio has converted 34.31% of breakpoint opportunities, and Polmans has converted 39.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gaio 1 - 0 Polmans
13
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
9
Minor
236
Rank
124
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
167
Rank
116
High
26
Age
R
Plays
13
Total
0
Mast
3
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
10
Minor
Form
54% (515-431)
Career Total W/L
56% (320-252)
25% (3-9)
YTD W/L
33% (3-6)
$392,005
Career Prize Money
$579,380
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Federico Gaio | Marc Polmans |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 10 |
Aces (Total) | 10 | 7 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 1:49:1 | 1:49:1 |
1st Serve % | 70% (51/73) | 67% (57/85) |
1st Serve Win% | 82% (42/51) | 67% (38/57) |
2nd Serve Win% | 41% (9/22) | 46% (13/28) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 50% (1/2) |
Return Points W% | 40% (34/85) | 30% (22/73) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 7-6(7) |
Federico Gaio
Player
Marc Polmans
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
10
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Federico Gaio | Marc Polmans |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 25% (3/9) | 33% (3/6) |
Sets Win/Loss | 28% (8/21) | 33% (7/14) |
Games Win/Loss | 41% (109/157) | 45% (86/105) |
Hard Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) | 38% (3/5) |
Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.38 | 0.42 |
Aces Total | 50 | 39 |
DFs per game | 0.35 | 0.34 |
DFs Total | 46 | 32 |
Avg Match Time | 1:43:22 | 1:42:2 |
Avg Opp Rank | 256.5 | 293.44 |
1st Serve % | 56% (470/841) | 68% (431/630) |
1st Serve W% | 67% (313/470) | 68% (294/431) |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (177/371) | 45% (89/199) |
BPs Won% Total | 32% (20/62) | 37% (15/41) |
Return Pts W% | 34% (291/860) | 35% (202/585) |
Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 25% (2/6) | 40% (2/3) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 18% (2/11) | 38% (3/8) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 75% (4/3) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (4/1) |
1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 0% (5/0) |
Federico Gaio Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Federico Gaio
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
46%
(
27 of
59)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
10
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Federico Gaio
Player
Blaise Bicknell
56%
(
55 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
7
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
6
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
37 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Federico Gaio
67%
(
64 of
95)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
0
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
1
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Federico Gaio
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
21 of
40)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Federico Gaio
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Federico Gaio
Player
Karan Singh
43%
(
38 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
5
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
61%
(
31 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mukund Sasikumar
Player
Federico Gaio
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
12
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Andre Ilagan
Player
Federico Gaio
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
0
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Omni Kumar
Player
Federico Gaio
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Jakub Mensik
Player
Federico Gaio
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
88)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
24 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Marc Polmans Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Player
Marc Polmans
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Liam Broady
Player
Marc Polmans
43%
(
22 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Marc Polmans
41%
(
20 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Marc Polmans
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Marc Polmans
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
90)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
49 of
66)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Marc Polmans
Player
Mikalai Haliak
75%
(
82 of
109)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
104)
3
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
38 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
110
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marc Polmans
Player
Makoto Ochi
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alexei Popyrin
Player
Marc Polmans
72%
(
63 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
77 of
113)
20
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
51 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
51 of
77)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
21 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
113
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Marc Polmans
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Zizou Bergs
Player
Marc Polmans
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H |
view more