F. Cina
To Win
C. L. C. Wong
To Win
Federico Cina vs Jan Choinski Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W L W L L
Form
W W L L W L W W L LH2H: Cina 0 - 0 Choinski
| Cina | Stats | Choinski |
|---|---|---|
| 77% (10-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 38% (6-10) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 373 | Ranking | 183 |
| 371 | Highest Rank | 126 |
| 18 | Age | 28 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 2 | Titles | 14 |
| 59% (43-30) | Career Total W/L | 59% (386-273) |
| $35,260 | Career Prize Money | $285,015 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
Upcoming Match
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Maneiro VS Frech PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Federico Cina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Raphael Collignon
Player
Federico Cina
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Federico Cina
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Francisco Comesana
76%
(
64 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
3
Aces
15
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Federico Cina
74%
(
63 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Aslan Karatsev
45%
(
28 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Ergi Kirkin
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
83)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
58%
(
54 of
93)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Martin Damm
71%
(
57 of
80)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
4
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
7
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
25%
(
20 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(3) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Saba Purtseladze
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
24%
(
16 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jan Choinski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Jan Choinski
49%
(
19 of
39)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Jan Choinski
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Arthur Gea
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve %
59%
(
49 of
83)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Jan Choinski
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Oriol Roca Batalla
76%
(
62 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Jan Choinski
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
79%
(
53 of
67)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Jan Choinski
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Philip Henning
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (43/30) | Win/Loss | 59% (386/273) |
| 58% (94/68) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (868/658) |
| 52% (805/737) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7530/6696) |
| 62% (29/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (60/52) |
| 54% (14/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (219/133) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59% (104/73) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 17% (3/15) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
| 178 | Aces Total | 1752 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 188 | Total Double Faults | 927 |
| 1:42:25 | Average Match Time | 1:20:7 |
| 367.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 478.18 |
| 61% (2958/4868) | 1st Serve % | 65% (24204/37035) |
| 68% (2000/2958) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (16390/24204) |
| 51% (968/1910) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (6595/12831) |
| 42% (230/550) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1658/3798) |
| 42% (2108/5070) | Return Points Win % | 40% (15050/37223) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 38% (6/10) |
| 50% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 36% (10/18) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (10/12) | Challenger W/L | 53% (144/130) |
| 65% (32/17) | Futures W/L | 67% (225/113) |
| 59% (42/71) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (374/639) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 45% (5/11) |
| 79% (19/24) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (96/182) |
| 50% (9/18) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (106/204) |
| 84% (44/37) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (369/326) |
| 16% (44/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (369/43) |
| 21% (29/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (289/59) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
