Faisal Qamar vs Rithvik Anand Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Qamar vs Anand analysis and find out who is favored!
Faisal Qamar vs Rithvik Anand Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Qamar has won 49.06% of points on his second serve, while Anand has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Qamar, in recent form, has won 47.83% of his opponent's second serve points, while Anand has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.33% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Qamar has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Anand has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Qamar has won 40% of matches played (W/L 6/ 9), with Anand winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Qamar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 55/ 43), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Anand has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 5/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Qamar has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 6/ 9), where as Anand has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Qamar winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Qamar winning 2 and Anand winning 0. The last match between Qamar and Anand was at the India F6, 19-09-2016, Q1 round, Hard with Faisal Qamar getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Qamar and Anand have played a deciding set 0 times, with Qamar winning 0 times and Anand 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Qamar winning 0, and Anand 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Qamar has played against opponents with an average rank of 12.33 while Anand has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Qamar has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Anand has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Qamar has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Anand has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Qamar 1 - 0 Anand
Faisal Qamar
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
29
Age
R
Plays
Rithvik Anand
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
55% (71-57)
Career Total W/L
25% (5-15)
50% (3-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Faisal Qamar | Rithvik Anand |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 4 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-0 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Faisal Qamar | Rithvik Anand |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 43% (6/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 52% (77/70) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.03 | 0 |
Aces Total | 2 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.11 | 0 |
DFs Total | 8 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 62% (86/139) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 60% (52/86) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (26/53) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 33% (5/15) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 40% (58/144) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Faisal Qamar Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Faisal Qamar
47%
(
34 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
9
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
6
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Faisal Qamar
Player
Jiayang Dong
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 4-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 5-7 6-4 10-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Vishnu Vardhan
Player
Faisal Qamar
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Faisal Qamar
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
8 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Faisal Qamar
Player
Ha Minh Duc Vu
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Rithvik Anand Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 5-7 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more