Prediction of Facundo Mena [192nd] vs Ulises Blanch [802nd] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L L L W L L L
Form
L W L L L L L W W LH2H: Mena 3 - 0 Blanch
They have played 7 sets in total, with Mena winning 6 and Blanch winning 1. The last match between Mena and Blanch was at the Santa Fe Challenger, 08-06-2024, Semifinals, Clay with Facundo Mena getting the victory 7-6(3) 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Facundo Mena | 3 |
| Ulises Blanch | 0 |
| Mena | Stats | Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| 38% (6-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 67% (2-1) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 192 | Ranking | 802 |
| 127 | Highest Rank | 236 |
| 32 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 15 | Titles | 4 |
| 57% (499-376) | Career Total W/L | 53% (218-194) |
| $140,110 | Career Prize Money | $54,150 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Facundo Mena
Player
Ulises Blanch
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
50%
(
54 of
108)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
11
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
| 3-6 7-5 6-2 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Ulises Blanch
53%
(
41 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
54 of
102)
13
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 6-4 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Ulises Blanch
46%
(
33 of
72)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
76)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 43 | Games Won | 35 |
| 24 | Aces (Total) | 19 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 24 |
| 1:54:51 | Average Match Time | 1:54:51 |
| 54% (125/231) | 1st Serve % | 51% (145/286) |
| 74% (93/125) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (93/145) |
| 45% (48/106) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (66/141) |
| 41% (13/32) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (10/24) |
| 44% (127/286) | Return Points Win % | 39% (90/231) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (3/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Facundo Mena vs Ulises Blanch Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mena 3 - 0 Blanch
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mena has won 45.14% of points on their second serve, while Blanch has won 38.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mena, in recent form, has won 40.54% of their opponent's second serve points, while Blanch has won 40%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.93% and 14.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mena has saved 54.36% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Blanch has saved 30% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mena has won 62.69% of matches played (W/L 42/ 25), with Blanch winning 55% (W/L 11/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mena has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Blanch has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 88/ 82).
- Player level: In the last year, Mena has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.18% of matches (W/L 32/ 23), where as Blanch has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 7/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Mena winning 3 times and Blanch being victorious 0 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Mena winning 6 and Blanch winning 1. The last match between Mena and Blanch was at the Santa Fe Challenger, 08-06-2024, Semifinals, Clay with Facundo Mena getting the victory 7-6(3) 7-6(5).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:54:51.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mena and Blanch have played a deciding set 1 times, with Mena winning 1 times and Blanch 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Mena winning 3, and Blanch 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mena has played against opponents with an average rank of 238.16 while Blanch has played against players with an average rank of 263.25.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mena has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Blanch has won 75% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mena has converted 31.82% of breakpoint opportunities, and Blanch has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Facundo Mena vs Ulises Blanch Best Odds For The Match
Facundo Mena Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Facundo Mena
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
46%
(
38 of
82)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Facundo Mena
77%
(
76 of
99)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
104
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Facundo Mena
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
42%
(
18 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Maximus Jones
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valerio Aboian
Player
Facundo Mena
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Facundo Mena
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gustavo Heide
Player
Facundo Mena
52%
(
16 of
31)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
54
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Facundo Mena
61%
(
78 of
128)
1st Serve %
56%
(
80 of
142)
4
Aces
6
8
Double Faults
1
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
56 of
80)
60%
(
30 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
41 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
51 of
142)
138
Total Points Won
132
|
7-6(8) 6-7(6) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Hugo Dellien
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
74%
(
25 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
60
|
3-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Federico Coria
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
14
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
9%
(
1 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
14 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ulises Blanch Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-7(6) 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Joe Leather
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Filippo Mazzola
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve %
62%
(
18 of
29)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
37
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Ulises Blanch
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
8
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
13 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Donski
Player
Ulises Blanch
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejo Lorenzo Lingua Lavallen
Player
Ulises Blanch
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
49%
(
36 of
74)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
11
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leonardo Aboian
Player
Ulises Blanch
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
32 of
37)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dali Blanch
Player
Ulises Blanch
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
9
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Aleksandr Lobanov
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
70 of
127)
18
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
17
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
49 of
70)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
55 of
127)
110
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Ulises Blanch
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
50%
(
54 of
108)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
11
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Mena vs Blanch?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Mena Vs Blanch is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (499/376) | Win/Loss | 53% (218/194) |
| 55% (1100/892) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (507/441) |
| 52% (9552/8975) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (4718/4495) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.53 |
| 2549 | Aces Total | 2372 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 1468 | Total Double Faults | 1423 |
| 1:2:10 | Average Match Time | 1:26:57 |
| 212.37 | Average Opponent Rank | 271.4 |
| 55% (20129/36924) | 1st Serve % | 57% (15063/26526) |
| 70% (14151/20129) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (11155/15063) |
| 50% (8462/16795) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (5724/11463) |
| 43% (1692/3909) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (884/2273) |
| 41% (15472/37912) | Return Points Win % | 37% (9680/26487) |
| 57% (495/868) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (210/389) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/9) |
| 57% (150/261) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (89/165) |
| 57% (142/247) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (61/130) |
| 88% (471/413) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (227/191) |
| 12% (471/57) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (227/32) |
| 21% (404/85) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (185/26) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
