Fabio Fognini vs Jacob Fearnley Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second serve strength: Fearnley has a slightly better second serve, winning 45.64% of points, compared to Fognini's 41.92%. Could this be crucial in match outcomes?
• Return game comparison: Fognini edges Fearnley on second serve returns with 48.93% compared to 44.86%. His advantage extends in first serve returns, achieving 30.86% over Fearnley’s 23.68%.
• Composure under pressure: Fearnley shows strong resilience, saving 59.15% of breakpoints, surpassing Fognini’s 49.65%.
• Overall performance: In the past year, Fearnley achieved a 74.32% win rate, significantly higher than Fognini’s 50.91%, indicating overall superior form.
• Surface preferences: Fearnley excels on indoor hard courts with an 82% win rate but underperforms on clay (67%). Conversely, Fognini performs best on clay with a 63% win rate and struggles on indoor hard courts (42%).
• Competition level experience: Fearnley's win rate at 86.05% in lower-tier tournaments is higher than Fognini’s 65.22%, highlighting their proficiency at this level.
• Opponent quality: Fearnley (average opponent rank 190.45) and Fognini (186.73) face similarly ranked adversaries, implying comparable competition levels.
• Deciding set prowess: Fearnley boasts an 86% win rate in deciding sets over Fognini's 63%, which could be pivotal if the match extends to a final set.
• Break point conversion: Fognini’s 33.33% conversion rate slightly surpasses Fearnley’s 28.8%, a critical factor in tight games.

Editorial Prediction (May 7, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Fearnley and Fognini presents intriguing dynamics based on recent performances and career stats. While Fearnley shows a slight edge in second serve effectiveness and breakpoint defense, Fognini counters with superior return statistics and a better breakpoint conversion rate.

Fearnley's remarkable ability to win deciding sets alongside higher overall win rates over the past year adds weight in their favor. However, surface preferences suggest a potential challenge for Fearnley on clay, where Fognini exhibits his best performances.

Considering all factors, including Fearnley’s stronger composure under pressure and recent form, they hold a modest advantage entering the match. Thus, Fearnley is the likely winner in this anticipated encounter.