Fabio Fognini vs Alexander Ritschard Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

When analyzing the upcoming tennis match between Ritschard and Fognini, several key statistics provide valuable insights into their potential performance. Over the last six months, Ritschard has demonstrated a slightly better second serve performance, winning 44.41% of his points compared to Fognini's 42.71%. Historically, second serve efficacy often aligns with match prediction accuracy. However, Fognini has shown superior first serve return statistics, with a success rate of 29.34% compared to Ritschard's 28.83%.

Examining their return game, we find that Fognini excels, having won 48.68% of his opponent's second serve points. Conversely, Ritschard has managed a marginally lower rate of 44.44%. In terms of match pressure and breakpoint situations, Fognini prevails by saving 53.79% of breakpoints, whereas Ritschard saves 52.08%. This provides an edge in predicting in-game outcomes during high-pressure points.

Performance over the past year indicates Ritschard's win record stands at 60.42% (29 wins out of 48 matches), while Fognini's is 50% (26 wins out of 52 matches). Both players show a preference for clay surfaces; Ritschard has a win rate of 64% on clay, while Fognini closely follows with 63%. However, Fognini falters on indoor hard courts, managing only a 42% win rate, while Ritschard's least favorable surface is grass, with a win rate of 44%.

In relation to the level of play, Ritschard has achieved a 74.29% win rate in Challengers or ITF tournaments over the last year, surpassing Fognini's 65.22% in similar competitions. However, the quality of opponents they faced might affect these statistics, as Fognini competed against players averaging a rank of 185.54 compared to Ritschard facing those ranked at 227.98. Should the match proceed to a deciding set, Fognini boasts a significant advantage, winning 65% of such scenarios compared to Ritschard's 38% over the last year.

In terms of breakpoint opportunities, Ritschard demonstrates a slight edge by converting 35.29% of chances, while Fognini converts 33.01%. This metric can be pivotal for in-game betting when players face breakpoint opportunities. Given these statistics, Fognini appears better positioned to secure victory, particularly if the match extends into a deciding set.