Ewen Lumsden vs Benjamin Hannestad Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Oct at 12:31 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Lumsden vs B. Hannestad

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

DEN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Lumsden 1 - 0 Hannestad
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ewen Lumsden winning 2 and Benjamin Hannestad winning 0. The last match between Ewen Lumsden and Benjamin Hannestad was at the M25 Monastir, 14-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Ewen Lumsden getting the victory 6-4 7-6(2).
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Lumsden | 1 |
Hannestad | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Monastir(10-14-25)
E. Lumsden vs B. Hannestad H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
58.58% (99-70) | Career Total W/L | 58.10% (104-75) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
1 | Titles | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. Lumsden vs B. Hannestad Match Preview:
- Recent second serve performance shows that Benjamin Hannestad has a slight edge, winning 43.50% of points compared to Ewen Lumsden's 42.48%.
- How do their return games compare recently? Ewen Lumsden outperforms with 49.14% of second serve return points won, whereas Hannestad records 46.27%.
- Lumsden falls behind in first serve returns, winning 32.50%, while Hannestad achieves 35.55%.
- Under pressure, Hannestad excels, saving 51.75% of breakpoints compared to Lumsden's 46.80%.
- Last year's performance favors Hannestad, winning 60.42% of matches over Lumsden’s 46.81%.
- Which surface favors each player? Lumsden excels on Clay (65% win rate), whereas Hannestad thrives on Hard courts (65%).
- Competing mainly on Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K, Hannestad holds a better win rate of 60.42% versus Lumsden’s 48.89%.
- Hannestad faces tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 292.08, while Lumsden's rivals hold an average rank of 415.21.
- In deciding set scenarios, Hannestad’s superior performance is evident, winning 62% of such sets against Lumsden’s 37%.
Editorial Prediction (October 14, 2025, UTC):
The head-to-head analysis reveals intriguing insights into both players' strengths and performance trends. While Ewen Lumsden proves effective in return games, it is Benjamin Hannestad who displays a marginally stronger second serve in recent months.
Hannestad's adeptness at saving breakpoints and his higher win percentage over the past year indicate a solid competitive edge. His capability to succeed against higher-ranked opponents further underscores his resilience on the court.
Lumsden might find some comfort on clay, yet Hannestad seems better suited to hard courts, where he has historically performed well. Factor in his impressive record in deciding sets, and the odds seem to lean towards Hannestad.
Taking into account these statistical insights and recent form, Benjamin Hannestad appears to be the likely winner of the upcoming match.
Ewen Lumsden vs Benjamin Hannestad Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Lumsden vs B. Hannestad H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 10 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
7 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
1:52:3 | Average Match Time | 1:52:3 |
70% (54/77) | 1st Serve % | 77% (56/73) |
70% (38/54) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (32/56) |
35% (8/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (8/17) |
57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (3/6) |
45% (33/73) | Return Points Win % | 40% (31/77) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Lumsden Recent Matches Played
B. Hannestad Recent Matches Played

E. Lumsden vs B. Hannestad Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58.58% (99/70) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.10% (104/75) |
59.28% (230/158) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.25% (225/168) |
53.06% (1914/1693) | Games Win/Loss | 54.01% (1952/1662) |
60.16% (74/49) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.06% (54/39) |
64.71% (11/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.81% (37/27) |
48.28% (14/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59.09% (13/9) |
0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
284 | Aces Total | 157 |
0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
346 | Total Double Faults | 301 |
1:13:42 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
303.91 | Average Opponent Rank | 96.65 |
65% (5109/7870) | 1st Serve % | 63% (3762/5945) |
65% (3315/5109) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (2341/3762) |
46% (1273/2761) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1005/2183) |
47% (409/867) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (297/674) |
43% (3449/8018) | Return Points Win % | 43% (2461/5733) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
0.00% (0/2) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
59.28% (99/68) | Futures W/L | 59.20% (103/71) |
59% (97/165) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (101/171) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
56% (23/41) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (25/45) |
37% (19/52) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (22/41) |
85% (105/89) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (104/92) |
15% (105/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (104/10) |
14% (64/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (75/13) |