Evgenii Tiurnev vs Ruslan Tiukaev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does Tiurnev's second serve performance compare to Tiukaev's? Tiurnev has the edge, winning 43.85% of points on his second serve, while Tiukaev has won 36.42%.
• Who's better at returning second serves? Tiukaev shows strength with 50.66% of opponent's second serve points won, compared to Tiurnev's 45.51%.
• In terms of first serve returns, Tiukaev holds a significant advantage, winning 29.27% versus Tiurnev's 19.33%.
• Under pressure, who excels in saving breakpoints? Tiukaev narrowly leads, saving 52.11%, while Tiurnev saves 50% of breakpoints.
• Considering overall performance over the last year, Tiurnev boasts a better win rate of 70.91%, compared to Tiukaev's 62.07%.
• Which player's career surface preference gives them the upper hand? Tiurnev is better on I.hard with 69% wins; Tiukaev is stronger on Hard with 62% wins.
• When it comes to the level of play, Tiurnev has fared better in $10K tournaments, winning 75% of his matches compared to Tiukaev's 62.07%.
• Tiurnev typically faces opponents of a higher rank (average 439.45) compared to Tiukaev's stronger field (average rank of 118.05).
• In high-stakes scenarios, Tiurnev has a superior deciding set win rate at 64%, while Tiukaev trails at 54%.
• Which player converts breakpoints more effectively? Tiukaev is ahead with a 40.63% conversion rate, while Tiurnev manages 29.33%.

Editorial Prediction (June 8, 2025, UTC):

As we evaluate the clash between Tiurnev and Tiukaev, several key metrics stand out. Tiurnev showcases stronger capabilities on his second serve, which could prove critical in tighter games. However, Tiukaev's exceptional return game, particularly against first serves, might give him the upper hand in neutralizing Tiurnev's serve advantage.

In terms of pressure handling, both players show resilience with comparable breakpoint save percentages. Yet, Tiukaev's superior rate of converting breakpoints could change the momentum dramatically. Tiurnev, on the other hand, enjoys a better deciding set performance, which may be pivotal if the match goes the distance.

Surface preferences reveal a tactical divide: Tiurnev's strongest performances occur on I.hard, while Tiukaev thrives on Hard surfaces. However, Tiurnev has faced opponents with a less competitive average rank relative to those Tiukaev has encountered.

Given these factors, the match presents an intriguing contrast of strengths. Despite Tiukaev's impressive return stats and breakpoint conversion, Tiurnev's overall winning record and proficiency in deciding sets tip the scales in his favor.

Considering these statistics and recent trends, Tiurnev is likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming match.