Evan Zhu vs Nick Chappell Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Jun at 07:36 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Zhu vs N. Chappell

USA
2
Win
Played
1
Win

USA
2
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Zhu 2 - 1 Chappell
They have played 8 sets in total, with Evan Zhu winning 4 and Nick Chappell winning 4. The last match between Evan Zhu and Nick Chappell was at the M15 Luan, 10-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 2-6 6-4 7-6(2).
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Zhu | 2 |
Chappell | 1 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Luan(06-10-25)
(R1) Canada F7 (Toronto)(09-11-18)
(R1) USA F30(09-27-16)
E. Zhu vs N. Chappell H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$3,445 | Career Prize Money | $24,525 |
50.42% (239-235) | Career Total W/L | 52.88% (321-286) |
2 | Hard | 1 |
3 | Titles | 2 |
2 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. Zhu vs N. Chappell Match Preview:
- In terms of second serve points, Zhu secures 45.31%, whereas Chappell slightly edges out with 45.42%. Could this marginal difference hint at a Chappell advantage?
- Looking at return game stats, Zhu outperforms by winning 46.36% of second serve returns compared to Chappell’s 42.74%. This appears to provide Zhu with a competitive edge when breaking serves.
- For first serve returns, Zhu again comes ahead with 32.04%, slightly above Chappell’s 30.18%. Does this indicate Zhu’s superior return capability in general?
- Under pressure, Chappell shows resilience, saving 53.49% of breakpoints, compared to Zhu’s 44.78%. Chappell seems to hold composure better during critical moments.
- Considering overall performance, Zhu boasts a 55% match win rate over the past year, while Chappell has 51.72%. This suggests a slight advantage for Zhu in overall match success.
- Both players excel on different surfaces: Zhu shines on clay with 59%, and Chappell matches the win percentage on hard courts. Neither fares well on grass.
- Over the last year, Zhu played predominantly in Futures/ITF tournaments, winning 57.78%. Chappell’s similar focus yielded a 55.56% win rate. This portrays related playing experiences and success levels.
- In direct encounters, they are tied with one win each. Their total sets score slightly favors Chappell with 3 out of 5.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Zhu has a superior record, winning 67% compared to Chappell’s 40% in past 12 months.
- Regarding opponent quality, Chappell has faced slightly stiffer competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 383.28 versus Zhu's 445.93.
- Chappell leads in breakpoint conversion with 43.18% compared to Zhu’s 31.32%, possibly indicating a sharpness in capitalizing on key moments.
Editorial Prediction (June 10, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing both players’ strengths and weaknesses reveals a tight competition. Zhu exhibits a reliable return game and a marked improvement in deciding sets.
Chappell demonstrates excellent composure under pressure and decent breakpoint conversion, crucial in tighter situations. His ability to confront higher-ranked opponents occasionally gives him an edge.
The historical head-to-head data offers a balanced outlook with both players evenly matched over previous encounters. Given these insights and recent performances, Chappell is marginally favored to win the upcoming match, leveraging his aptitude under pressure and efficient breakpoint execution.
Evan Zhu vs Nick Chappell Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Zhu vs N. Chappell H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
2 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
4 | Sets Won | 4 |
33 | Games Won | 45 |
8 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
8 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
2:35:59 | Average Match Time | 2:35:59 |
60% (165/274) | 1st Serve % | 62% (181/291) |
56% (93/165) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (110/181) |
44% (48/109) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (54/110) |
39% (11/28) | Break Pts Won % | 53% (17/32) |
44% (127/291) | Return Points Win % | 49% (133/274) |
67% (2/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 33% (1/3) |
100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 33% (1/3) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 67% (2/3) |
67% (2/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Zhu Recent Matches Played
N. Chappell Recent Matches Played

E. Zhu vs N. Chappell Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
50.42% (239/235) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.88% (321/286) |
49.05% (544/565) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.33% (745/652) |
50.02% (5223/5218) | Games Win/Loss | 51.55% (6716/6313) |
49.36% (154/158) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.40% (233/166) |
58.54% (72/51) | Clay Win/Loss | 44.36% (59/74) |
36.11% (13/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 39.44% (28/43) |
0.00% (0/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 25.00% (1/3) |
0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
1247 | Aces Total | 1438 |
0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
1156 | Total Double Faults | 946 |
1:23:48 | Average Match Time | 1:26:4 |
478.43 | Average Opponent Rank | 468.41 |
62% (17270/28003) | 1st Serve % | 62% (21000/33748) |
66% (11364/17270) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (13874/21000) |
49% (5264/10733) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6435/12748) |
42% (1121/2694) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1466/3409) |
40% (10962/27652) | Return Points Win % | 40% (13571/33958) |
0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
14.29% (1/6) | Main Tour W/L | 36.36% (4/7) |
41.61% (62/87) | Challenger W/L | 39.33% (70/108) |
55.35% (176/142) | Futures W/L | 59.23% (247/170) |
50% (232/467) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (311/594) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (6/6) |
52% (69/133) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (75/157) |
57% (94/166) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (77/185) |
84% (226/190) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (342/283) |
16% (226/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (342/59) |
19% (248/48) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (264/36) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
