Eva Maria Ionescu vs Allegra Korpanec Davies Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Recent second serve performance shows Eva Maria Ionescu ahead, winning 38.66% compared to Allegra Korpanec Davies' 36.86%. Could Eva's marginal advantage in second serve points translate to a decisive win?
• On return games, Allegra Korpanec Davies slightly edges out Eva, claiming 50.61% of opponents' second serve points, versus Eva's 50.53%. How critical might this be during the match?
• For first serve returns, Allegra leads again with 37.88% over Eva's 36.08%. This suggests Allegra might have a slight upper hand in breaking serve.
• Under pressure, Allegra excels in saving breakpoints, securing 48.95% compared to Eva's 43.49%. This could affect key moments in the match.
• Examining their yearly performance, Eva Maria Ionescu boasts a higher win rate of 55.17% compared to Allegra's 42.11%, indicating a better overall skill level and consistency.
• Surface preferences show Allegra performs best on clay with a 56% win rate, whereas Eva thrives on hard surfaces at the same 56% rate. Will the match surface play a role in deciding the winner?
• In terms of match experience, Eva plays more on the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K circuit, holding a 62.50% win rate, while Allegra participates similarly but wins 36.36% of the time. Does Eva's greater success at this level suggest a winning edge?
• Considering the quality of past opponents, Eva has faced better-ranked players, with an average rank of 342.6 compared to Allegra's 401.26. Can this experience against stronger competition prove advantageous for Eva?
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Eva's 64% success rate far exceeds Allegra's 29%, potentially giving Eva a confidence boost in critical situations.
• Break point conversion is nearly equal, with both players around 39%, but slight variations can swing momentum, particularly in tight games.

Editorial Prediction (November 19, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Allegra Korpanec Davies and Eva Maria Ionescu presents intriguing dynamics based on current statistics and historical performance.

While Allegra holds slight advantages in return games and resilience under pressure, Eva consistently demonstrates stronger overall performance, especially in deciding sets and against higher-ranked opponents.

Their preferred playing surfaces align evenly at their best win rates, suggesting surface type might not heavily influence this meeting.

Given Eva's superior win record over the past year, coupled with her ability to perform in clutch moments, she appears to be the likely favorite to win this match.