Prediction of Eva Haslinghuis vs Claudia Piccini Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
E. Haslinghuis vs C. Piccini

Eva Haslinghuis

NED

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

284

Best Rank

530

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Claudia Piccini

ITA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

284

Best Rank

530

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Haslinghuis 1 - 0 Piccini

They have played 2 sets in total, with Eva Haslinghuis winning 2 and Claudia Piccini winning 0. The last match between Eva Haslinghuis and Claudia Piccini was at the ITF Palermo, 01-07-1991, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Eva Haslinghuis getting the victory 6-0 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Haslinghuis	1
Piccini	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) ITF Palermo(07-01-91)

Stats

Eva Haslinghuis

Claudia Piccini

E. Haslinghuis vs C. Piccini H2H Profile

E. Haslinghuis	Stats	C. Piccini
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
57.14% (56-42)	Career Total W/L	28.33% (17-43)
1	Clay	0
1	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

E. Haslinghuis vs C. Piccini Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Eva Haslinghuis has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Claudia Piccini has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Eva Haslinghuis, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Claudia Piccini has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Eva Haslinghuis has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Claudia Piccini has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Eva Haslinghuis has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Claudia Piccini winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Eva Haslinghuis has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 47/31), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 36% (W/L 5/9). Claudia Piccini has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 4/10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 27% (W/L 12/32).
Player level: In the last year, Eva Haslinghuis has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Claudia Piccini has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Eva Haslinghuis winning 1 times and Claudia Piccini being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Eva Haslinghuis winning 2 and Claudia Piccini winning 0.
The last match between Eva Haslinghuis and Claudia Piccini was at the ITF Palermo, 01-07-1991, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Eva Haslinghuis getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Eva Haslinghuis has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Claudia Piccini has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Eva Haslinghuis has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Claudia Piccini has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Eva Haslinghuis has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Claudia Piccini has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Eva Haslinghuis vs Claudia Piccini Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

E. Haslinghuis vs C. Piccini H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

E. Haslinghuis	Stats	C. Piccini
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	2
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

E. Haslinghuis Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Nuriootpa - 23-11-1992
R3 Louise StaceyL. Stacey	L	6-3 7-5	Stats
ITF Port Pirie - 16-11-1992
Q1 Cintia TortorellaC. Tortorella	L	6-7(4) 7-6(5) 7-6(5)	Stats
ITF Mount Gambier - 09-11-1992
Q1 Tanja StegkamperT. Stegkamper	W	7-5 6-2	Stats
Q2 Janette HusarovaJ. Husarova	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
ITF Karlovy Vary - 14-09-1992
Q1 Luciana TellaL. Tella	W	6-1 5-7 6-0	Stats

View All

C. Piccini Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Erd - 09-12-1991
R3 Dominika GoreckaD. Gorecka	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
ITF Arzachena - 02-09-1991
Q1 Justine HodderJ. Hodder	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
ITF Sezze - 22-07-1991
Q1 Elisabetta PuleraE. Pulera	L	1-6 6-3 3-1 RET	Stats
Palermo - 08-07-1991
Q1 Nathalie BalletN. Ballet	L	2-6 6-1 6-2	Stats
ITF Palermo - 01-07-1991
R3 Eva HaslinghuisE. Haslinghuis	L	6-0 6-2	Stats

View All

E. Haslinghuis vs C. Piccini Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

E. Haslinghuis	Stats	C. Piccini
57.14% (56/42)	YTD Win/Loss	28.33% (17/43)
55.31% (125/101)	Sets Win/Loss	33.81% (47/92)
53.29% (1101/965)	Games Win/Loss	43.64% (549/709)
35.71% (5/9)	Hard Win/Loss	28.57% (4/10)
60.26% (47/31)	Clay Win/Loss	27.27% (12/32)
66.67% (4/2)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.00% (1/1)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
476.64	Average Opponent Rank	461.15
56.99% (53/40)	Challenger W/L	28.81% (17/42)
58% (56/97)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	29% (17/59)
0% (0/0)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/1)
38% (5/13)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	17% (1/6)
59% (19/32)	Deciding Set Win %	33% (6/18)
82% (57/47)	1st Set Won, Won Match	65% (23/15)
18% (57/10)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	35% (23/8)
23% (40/9)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	5% (37/2)