Eugenie Sampson Kamrath vs Berenice Ayer Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
E. Sampson Kamrath vs B. Ayer

Eugenie Sampson Kamrath

USA

0

Win

Played

0

Win

112

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Berenice Ayer

USA

0

Win

Played

0

Win

112

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Kamrath 0 - 0 Ayer

They have played 6 sets in total, with Eugenie Sampson Kamrath winning 3 and Berenice Ayer winning 3. The last match between Eugenie Sampson Kamrath and Berenice Ayer was at the Chicago, 11-06-1934, Round: SF, Surface: N/A, with Eugenie Sampson Kamrath getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Kamrath	0
Ayer	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(SF) Chicago(06-11-34)

Stats

Eugenie Sampson Kamrath

Berenice Ayer

(SF) Chicago State(07-06-31)

Stats

Berenice Ayer

Eugenie Sampson Kamrath

E. S. Kamrath vs B. Ayer H2H Profile

E. S. Kamrath	Stats	B. Ayer
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
48.39% (30-32)	Career Total W/L	41.18% (14-20)
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

E. S. Kamrath vs B. Ayer Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Eugenie Sampson Kamrath has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Berenice Ayer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Eugenie Sampson Kamrath, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Berenice Ayer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Eugenie Sampson Kamrath has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Berenice Ayer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Eugenie Sampson Kamrath has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Berenice Ayer winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Eugenie Sampson Kamrath has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 12/9), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 22% (W/L 2/7). Berenice Ayer has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 57% (W/L 2/2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 25% (W/L 1/3).
Player level: In the last year, Eugenie Sampson Kamrath has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Berenice Ayer has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Eugenie Sampson Kamrath winning 1 times and Berenice Ayer being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Eugenie Sampson Kamrath winning 3 and Berenice Ayer winning 3.
The last match between Eugenie Sampson Kamrath and Berenice Ayer was at the Chicago, 11-06-1934, Round: SF, Surface: N/A, with Eugenie Sampson Kamrath getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Deciding set H2H prediction: Eugenie Sampson Kamrath and Berenice Ayer have played a deciding set 2 times, with Eugenie Sampson Kamrath winning 1 times and Berenice Ayer 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Eugenie Sampson Kamrath has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Berenice Ayer has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Eugenie Sampson Kamrath has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Berenice Ayer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Eugenie Sampson Kamrath has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Berenice Ayer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Eugenie Sampson Kamrath vs Berenice Ayer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

E. S. Kamrath vs B. Ayer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

E. S. Kamrath	Stats	B. Ayer
1	H2H Matches Won	1
3	Sets Won	3
27	Games Won	25
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
50% (1/2)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

E. S. Kamrath Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Houston - 31-03-1947
Gussie MoranG. Moran	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
R4 June KnoxJ. Knox	W	6-0 6-3	Stats
Houston - 15-04-1946
Peggy StartzmanP. Startzman	L	4-6 6-1 6-3	Stats
Chicago State - 15-07-1935
F Elizabeth KestingE. Kesting	L	6-0 8-6	Stats
Chicago - 29-06-1935
Lila PorterL. Porter	L	6-1 3-6 8-6	Stats

View All

B. Ayer Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Miami - 22-02-1938
R3 Sue DeweeseS. Deweese	W	6-1 6-1	Stats
SF Catherine SampleC. Sample	L	2-6 7-5 6-4	Stats
R4 Betty CampbellB. Campbell	W	6-2 6-1	Stats
Mrs George WardmanM. George	W	6-0 6-1	Stats
St. Petersburg 1 - 14-02-1938
SF Lila PorterL. Porter	L	6-0 6-0	Stats

View All

E. S. Kamrath vs B. Ayer Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

E. S. Kamrath	Stats	B. Ayer
48.39% (30/32)	YTD Win/Loss	41.18% (14/20)
52.71% (68/61)	Sets Win/Loss	41.89% (31/43)
50.77% (594/576)	Games Win/Loss	47.40% (292/324)
57.14% (12/9)	Clay Win/Loss	25.00% (1/3)
0% (0/0)	Indoor Hard W/L	0.00% (0/1)
22.22% (2/7)	Grass Win/Loss	50.00% (2/2)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
0.00% (0/2)	Slam W/L	0.00% (0/1)
50% (29/58)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	41% (14/34)
23% (3/13)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (3/6)
83% (35/29)	1st Set Won, Won Match	88% (16/14)
17% (35/6)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (16/2)
0% (23/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (18/0)