Erika Andreeva vs Lucrezia Stefanini Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In comparison of their performance at second serve, Andreeva has a slight edge, winning 43.49% of her points in the last six months, while Stefanini managed 38.12%. This statistic is notably correlated with match prediction accuracy, making it a valuable indicator of potential outcomes. However, when it comes to returning the second serve, Stefanini outshines Andreeva with a success rate of 53.59% compared to Andreeva's 47.18%. For returns against first serves, Stefanini maintains an advantage with 38.68% over Andreeva's 33.99%.

Analyzing their capability to handle pressure, Andreeva has saved 58.67% of breakpoints, which surpasses Stefanini's 47.71%. On the conversion side, Stefanini has proven more efficient by taking advantage of 45.9% of her breakpoint opportunities, compared to Andreeva’s 38.66% conversion rate.

In terms of surface preference, Andreeva has her best win percentage on indoor hard courts, with a 67% success rate, whereas Stefanini performs best on hard courts, boasting a 63% win rate. Both players have their lowest win percentages on grass, with Andreeva at 56% and Stefanini at 53%.

Looking at overall career performance, Andreeva has won 47.37% of her matches in the past year, with a record of 27 wins and 30 losses. Stefanini, meanwhile, has a stronger winning percentage of 60% over the same period, with a record of 39 wins and 26 losses. Notably, Andreeva has faced opponents with an average rank of 137.93, whereas Stefanini’s opponents had an average rank of 229.52.

Direct head-to-head assessments reveal that these players have met once at the San Luis Potosi Open where Stephanini emerged victorious. The historical match duration averages to 21 minutes and 41 seconds. Neither player has experienced a deciding set or tiebreak in their direct encounters, suggesting a limited data set for predicting outcomes in such scenarios.

Over the past year, Andreeva has primarily competed in main tour matches, achieving a 40% win rate, whereas Stefanini has been more successful on the Challenger/ITF circuit with a 63.41% win rate. While Stefanini has demonstrated stronger overall match-winning capabilities, the more challenging competition faced by Andreeva might offer her an edge in adapting to higher-pressure situations.

In conclusion, based on the array of statistics available, Stefanini seems to have a slight advantage entering this match owing to her higher win percentage, stronger return game, and favorable breakpoint conversion rates. However, considering the level of competition Andreeva has engaged with recently, it remains an open contest with Stefanini slightly favored to win.