Ena Shibahara vs Maddison Inglis Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 25 Apr at 02:46 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Shibahara vs M. Inglis

USA
3
Win
Played
1
Win

AUS
3
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Shibahara 3 - 1 Inglis
They have played 9 sets in total, with Ena Shibahara winning 7 and Maddison Inglis winning 2. The last match between Ena Shibahara and Maddison Inglis was at the W100 Tokyo, 25-04-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Ena Shibahara getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Shibahara | 3 |
| Inglis | 1 |
Last 4 H2H Matches:
(QF) W100 Tokyo(04-25-25)
(Q1) Rothesay Open - Nottingham(06-08-24)
(F) W100 Tokyo(04-28-24)
E. Shibahara vs M. Inglis H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $368,173 | Career Prize Money | $628,555 |
| 57.45% (162-120) | Career Total W/L | 58.95% (313-218) |
| 1 | Grass | 0 |
| 2 | Hard | 1 |
| 1 | Titles | 9 |
| 3 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 33.33% (3-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-6) |
E. Shibahara vs M. Inglis Match Preview:
In recent performance over the last six months, Ena Shibahara has demonstrated a higher second serve efficiency by winning 47.79% of points, compared to Maddison Inglis who has secured 41.18% in the same category. This second serve performance is crucial for accurate match predictions.
Analyzing the return game, Shibahara has managed to win 46.11% of her opponent's second serve points during recent matches, whereas Inglis has a marginally higher success rate of 46.36%. When it comes to first serve returns, Shibahara and Inglis display very similar accuracy, reflecting percentages of 30.84% and 30.72% respectively. These statistics are significant in determining the favorite in head-to-head matchups.
Under pressure, Shibahara shows resilience by saving 52.6% of break points, while Inglis trails slightly, saving 47.51%. This is a critical indicator for in-game betting. Shibahara has a historical advantage in head-to-head encounters, winning 2 of their 3 meetings and leading 5-2 in sets.
Comparing their overall performance, Shibahara has won 62.3% of her matches over the past year, with a record of 38 wins and 23 losses. Inglis exceeds this with a win percentage of 65.79%, holding a record of 50 wins and 26 losses. Despite their close performance metrics, Inglis plays against slightly lower-ranked opponents, averaging a rank of 277.8 compared to Shibahara's 223.23.
In terms of surface preference, Shibahara excels on indoor hard courts with a career win rate of 67%, while showing vulnerabilities on clay with a 50% win rate. Inglis shows her strength on hard courts with 62% but has not won any matches on indoor hard courts out of two attempts. Both players mainly compete at the Challenger/ITF > $10K level, where Inglis holds a higher win percentage.
In a possible deciding set, Shibahara has an edge, winning 59% over the last year compared to Inglis's 50%. When under extreme pressure in tie-breaks, Shibahara claimed victory in their only encounter. Their last match took place at the Rothesay Open, where Shibahara triumphed 7-6(1), 6-2.
Considering breakpoint conversion rates gives Inglis an edge; however, Shibahara’s higher conversion rate of 38.97% against Inglis’s 35.12% is a factor in predicting momentum shifts during crucial moments. Evaluating all statistical angles and past performances, Shibahara appears to have a slight edge as the match favorite.
Ena Shibahara vs Maddison Inglis Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Shibahara vs M. Inglis H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 7 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 49 | Games Won | 36 |
| 19 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 16 |
| 1:46:51 | Average Match Time | 1:46:51 |
| 63% (184/292) | 1st Serve % | 59% (172/290) |
| 70% (129/184) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (107/172) |
| 45% (49/108) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (50/118) |
| 40% (14/35) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (9/31) |
| 46% (133/290) | Return Points Win % | 39% (114/292) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/3) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Shibahara Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 3-6 7-5 6-1 | ||
Rubber 1 | L | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
M. Inglis Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
F | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
SF | W | 7-5 6-1 | ||
QF | W | 7-5 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 7-6(3) 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||

E. Shibahara vs M. Inglis Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.45% (162/120) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.95% (313/218) |
| 55.95% (367/289) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.76% (703/514) |
| 52.82% (3198/2857) | Games Win/Loss | 53.12% (5886/5194) |
| 57.36% (113/84) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.87% (252/162) |
| 53.13% (17/15) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.81% (22/25) |
| 66.67% (24/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 36.36% (4/7) |
| 47.06% (8/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 59.32% (35/24) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 713 | Aces Total | 875 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 713 | Total Double Faults | 1444 |
| 1:25:26 | Average Match Time | 1:28:40 |
| 420.68 | Average Opponent Rank | 466.61 |
| 62% (10069/16218) | 1st Serve % | 65% (19626/30229) |
| 65% (6512/10049) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (12379/19626) |
| 48% (2998/6225) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (4969/10603) |
| 45% (835/1858) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1793/3776) |
| 43% (7108/16341) | Return Points Win % | 45% (14094/31455) |
| 66.67% (10/5) | Slam W/L | 43.90% (18/23) |
| 33.33% (3/6) | Masters W/L | 38.89% (7/11) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 41.18% (21/30) | Main Tour W/L | 42.86% (24/32) |
| 61.88% (125/77) | Challenger W/L | 63.14% (257/150) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 77.78% (7/2) |
| 57% (159/277) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (308/518) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 59% (37/63) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 65% (68/105) |
| 53% (51/97) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (84/162) |
| 86% (162/140) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (307/264) |
| 13% (162/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (307/43) |
| 18% (120/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (224/50) |
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Polina Kudermetova vs Camilla Rosatello Prediction – WTA Open In Arte Angers Loire – 1st December 2025 Best Bets

Argentina Open – Buenos Aires Preview And Prediction: Varvara Lepchenko vs Panna Udvardy Betting Tips & Picks November 30, 2025

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets
