En Shuo Liang vs Jenna Dean Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 19 Jun at 06:38 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Shuo Liang vs J. Dean

TPE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Liang 1 - 0 Dean
They have played 2 sets in total, with En Shuo Liang winning 2 and Jenna Dean winning 0. The last match between En Shuo Liang and Jenna Dean was at the W35 Wichita, 19-06-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with En Shuo Liang getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Liang | 1 |
| Dean | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W35 Wichita(06-19-25)
E. S. Liang vs J. Dean H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $265,799 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 53.16% (202-178) | Career Total W/L | 40.32% (25-37) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. S. Liang vs J. Dean Match Preview:
- In terms of second serve performance, Liang outperforms Dean with 40.06% against 35.58% over the last 6 months, indicating a stronger ability to win points on the second serve for Liang.
- Returning skills show a slight edge for Liang as well, with Liang winning 50.08% of their opponent's second serves compared to Dean's 48.06%.
- Regarding first serve returns, Dean has a small advantage, winning 32.86% of points on opponents' first serves, slightly ahead of Liang's 31.26%.
- Under pressure, Liang shows better composure, saving 56.82% of breakpoints compared to Dean's 52.1%.
- Looking at overall win percentage in the past year, Liang is more successful, winning 58.49% of matches, whereas Dean has won only 40%.
- Surface preference suggests Dean's strength lies in indoor hard courts with a 67% win rate, while Liang performs best on grass with a 55% win rate.
- At the level of competition, Liang has been more successful, winning 60% of matches compared to Dean's 46.15% in similar tournaments.
- Dean has faced slightly stronger competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 294.74 versus Liang's 311.83.
- Both players are equally adept in deciding sets, with each winning 56% of such scenarios over the past year, possibly indicating a closely contested match if it reaches that point.
- In breakpoint conversion, Liang excels, converting 40.29% compared to Dean's 32.39%, which could be crucial in tight games.
Editorial Prediction (June 19, 2025, UTC):
As we assess the upcoming match, several factors highlight Liang's potential edge over Dean. Liang’s superior win percentages in both overall match outcomes and break point conversions show a readiness to capitalize on critical moments.
Liang's stronger second serve performance and higher breakpoint saving ability under pressure make a persuasive case in their favor. Additionally, Liang's experience and success at Challenger/ITF tournaments, with a 60% win rate, compared to Dean's 46.15%, suggest a better adaptation to competitive play.
Based on these statistics, Liang is favored to win the upcoming tennis match, given their consistent performance indicators and recent form advantages over Dean.
En Shuo Liang vs Jenna Dean Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. S. Liang vs J. Dean H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:39:21 | Average Match Time | 1:39:21 |
| 48% (30/62) | 1st Serve % | 59% (44/74) |
| 73% (22/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (23/44) |
| 53% (17/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (18/30) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (2/3) |
| 45% (33/74) | Return Points Win % | 37% (23/62) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. S. Liang Recent Matches Played
J. Dean Recent Matches Played

E. S. Liang vs J. Dean Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.16% (202/178) | YTD Win/Loss | 40.32% (25/37) |
| 53.41% (470/410) | Sets Win/Loss | 40.44% (55/81) |
| 51.89% (4183/3878) | Games Win/Loss | 46.42% (584/674) |
| 55.09% (146/119) | Hard Win/Loss | 43.75% (14/18) |
| 40.82% (20/29) | Clay Win/Loss | 32.00% (8/17) |
| 54.35% (25/21) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 55.00% (11/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 786 | Aces Total | 67 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1152 | Total Double Faults | 109 |
| 1:30:28 | Average Match Time | 1:9:50 |
| 438.11 | Average Opponent Rank | 325.24 |
| 59% (14739/24830) | 1st Serve % | 63% (1605/2551) |
| 64% (9391/14739) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (921/1605) |
| 48% (4814/10091) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (406/946) |
| 46% (1366/2968) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (132/292) |
| 44% (10974/24687) | Return Points Win % | 44% (1091/2497) |
| 42.11% (8/11) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 66.67% (6/3) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46.81% (22/25) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53.82% (148/127) | Challenger W/L | 46.34% (19/22) |
| 65.22% (15/8) | Futures W/L | 28.57% (6/15) |
| 54% (200/371) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 39% (24/61) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (45/87) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (6/9) |
| 47% (59/125) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (7/13) |
| 85% (196/166) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (24/22) |
| 15% (196/30) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (24/2) |
| 20% (184/36) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (38/3) |