Emma Navarro vs Natsumi Kawaguchi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Navarro vs Kawaguchi analysis and find out who is favored!
Emma Navarro vs Natsumi Kawaguchi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Navarro has won 48.81% of points on his second serve, while Kawaguchi has won 41.49%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Navarro, in recent form, has won 58.21% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kawaguchi has won 52.6%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.12% and 39.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Navarro has saved 56.35% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kawaguchi has saved 47.93% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Navarro has won 73.96% of matches played (W/L 71/ 25), with Kawaguchi winning 48.72% (W/L 19/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Navarro has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 59/ 43). Kawaguchi has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 5/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Navarro has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 83.78% of matches (W/L 31/ 6), where as Kawaguchi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 12/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Navarro has played against opponents with an average rank of 173.1 while Kawaguchi has played against players with an average rank of 189.41.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Navarro has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kawaguchi has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Navarro has converted 46.77% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kawaguchi has converted 42.98% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Navarro 0 - 0 Kawaguchi
8
Total
0
Mast
7
Chall
0
Slam
1
Main
0
Minor
21
Rank
20
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
395
Rank
346
High
21
Age
Plays
4
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
Form
64% (172-97)
Career Total W/L
61% (78-49)
73% (22-8)
YTD W/L
33% (2-4)
$964,525
Career Prize Money
$8,310
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Emma Navarro | Natsumi Kawaguchi |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 73% (22/8) | 33% (2/4) |
Sets Win/Loss | 62% (48/29) | 40% (6/9) |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (387/320) | 46% (60/71) |
Hard Win/Loss | 75% (21/7) | 33% (2/4) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.11 | 0.06 |
Aces Total | 39 | 4 |
DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.19 |
DFs Total | 53 | 12 |
Avg Match Time | 1:50:50 | 1:48:40 |
Avg Opp Rank | 95.23 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 67% (1533/2303) | 72% (294/409) |
1st Serve W% | 63% (965/1533) | 58% (171/294) |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (370/770) | 37% (43/115) |
BPs Won% Total | 46% (142/311) | 44% (24/54) |
Return Pts W% | 46% (1108/2414) | 45% (199/439) |
Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 67% (8/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 79% (11/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 73% (22/30) | 33% (2/6) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 76% (13/17) | 33% (1/3) |
1st set W, W | 94% (16/15) | 67% (3/2) |
1st set W, L | 6% (16/1) | 33% (3/1) |
1st set L, W | 50% (14/7) | 0% (3/0) |
Natsumi Kawaguchi Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Sara Saito
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
72%
(
55 of
76)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Natsumi Kawaguchi
Player
Risako Togashi
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
48%
(
23 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kayo Nishimura
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
80%
(
51 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
2-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Natsumi Kawaguchi
Player
Mio Mushika
68%
(
76 of
112)
1st Serve %
47%
(
57 of
122)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
11
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
44%
(
49 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
60 of
122)
123
Total Points Won
111
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mai Hontama
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Natsumi Kawaguchi
Player
En Shuo Liang
60%
(
53 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Luksika Kumkhum
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
69%
(
66 of
96)
1st Serve %
71%
(
73 of
103)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Natsumi Kawaguchi
Player
Rinon Okuwaki
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more