Emma Lene vs Ruth Roura Llaverias Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 17 Jul at 02:31 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Lene vs R. Roura Llaverias

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Lene 1 - 0 Llaverias
They have played 3 sets in total, with Emma Lene winning 2 and Ruth Roura Llaverias winning 1. The last match between Emma Lene and Ruth Roura Llaverias was at the W35 Casablanca, 17-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Emma Lene getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lene | 1 |
| Llaverias | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W35 Casablanca(07-17-25)
E. Lene vs R. R. Llaverias H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 53.83% (204-175) | Career Total W/L | 56.92% (74-56) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 4 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. Lene vs R. R. Llaverias Match Preview:
- Lene has slightly better recent form with a second serve win percentage of 39.52%, compared to Llaverias' 38.03%. This difference could be pivotal in match predictions.
- On return games, Lene outperforms Llaverias by winning 54.52% of their opponent's second serve points, while Llaverias claims 53.25%.
- When facing first serves, Lene has the edge with a 35.29% success rate versus Llaverias’ 34.44%. Could these stats point to Lene's advantage?
- Both players exhibit similar resilience under pressure, with Lene saving 48.21% of breakpoints and Llaverias 48.03%.
- Llaverias shows a stronger performance history over the year, winning 65.52% of matches, compared to Lene’s 52.78%.
- Both excel on clay courts, yet Llaverias boasts a superior win rate of 66% versus Lene's 54%. Would this tilt the odds in Llaverias' favor?
- Llaverias dominates in the lower-tier ITF circuit, with an impressive 79.49% win rate, while Lene manages a 50% success rate in the ITF/Challengers.
- Lene faces tougher opponents, with an average rank of 120.03 against Llaverias’ 451.88. Does this indicate more experience against higher-caliber opponents?
- In deciding sets, Llaverias holds a distinct edge, winning 63% compared to Lene’s 45%. Could this prove crucial if the match goes the distance?
- Lene exhibits superior break point conversion at 48.76%, outshining Llaverias who converts at 39.77%. This statistic may predict decisive moments in the match.
Editorial Prediction (July 17, 2025, UTC):
The head-to-head stats between Lene and Llaverias present a fascinating matchup. Lene's ability to perform slightly better on second serve and return games suggests a possible advantage. However, Llaverias has demonstrated consistent success in lower-tier events and a higher win percentage over the past year.
Llaverias' stronger record on clay, alongside their higher breakpoint conversion rates and success in deciding sets, points to a complex dynamic. While Lene faces stronger opponents regularly, Llaverias' winning trends might be persuasive.
Based on these comparative insights, Llaverias appears to hold a slight edge, positioning them as the likely winner in the upcoming match.
Emma Lene vs Ruth Roura Llaverias Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Lene vs R. R. Llaverias H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 12 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:10:35 | Average Match Time | 2:10:35 |
| 63% (47/75) | 1st Serve % | 70% (63/90) |
| 68% (32/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (39/63) |
| 57% (16/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (9/27) |
| 31% (5/16) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (4/4) |
| 47% (42/90) | Return Points Win % | 36% (27/75) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Lene Recent Matches Played
R. R. Llaverias Recent Matches Played

E. Lene vs R. R. Llaverias Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.83% (204/175) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.92% (74/56) |
| 54.34% (457/384) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.52% (163/136) |
| 52.60% (3928/3539) | Games Win/Loss | 51.56% (1419/1333) |
| 54.44% (49/41) | Hard Win/Loss | 41.03% (16/23) |
| 53.73% (137/118) | Clay Win/Loss | 63.74% (58/33) |
| 52.94% (18/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 509 | Aces Total | 169 |
| 0.39 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.43 |
| 1403 | Total Double Faults | 577 |
| 1:19:12 | Average Match Time | 1:27:9 |
| 497.39 | Average Opponent Rank | 444.42 |
| 65% (12893/19817) | 1st Serve % | 60% (4621/7648) |
| 61% (7880/12893) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (2807/4621) |
| 42% (2901/6924) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1294/3027) |
| 50% (1232/2471) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (475/976) |
| 47% (8960/19200) | Return Points Win % | 46% (3584/7767) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 54.39% (93/78) | Challenger W/L | 37.04% (20/34) |
| 53.62% (111/96) | Futures W/L | 72.00% (54/21) |
| 55% (201/363) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (73/129) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (34/64) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (16/26) |
| 49% (48/98) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (24/40) |
| 88% (208/183) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (69/60) |
| 12% (208/24) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (69/9) |
| 13% (170/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (61/13) |