Emily Seibold vs Katja Markus Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Seibold vs K. Markus

Emily Seibold
GER
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
25
Age
20
-
Height
-
462
C. Rank
0
442
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Katja Markus
ARG
l
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
25
Age
20
-
Height
-
462
C. Rank
0
442
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Seibold 1 - 0 Markus
They have played 2 sets in total, with Emily Seibold winning 2 and Katja Markus winning 0. The last match between Emily Seibold and Katja Markus was at the W15 Sao Joao da Boa Vista, 13-03-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Emily Seibold getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Seibold | 1 |
| Markus | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Sao Joao da Boa Vista(03-13-24)
Emily Seibold
6
6
Katja Markus
1
1
E. Seibold vs K. Markus H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 54.52% (199-166) | Career Total W/L | 40.66% (37-54) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. Seibold vs K. Markus Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Emily Seibold has won 34.97% of points on their second serve, while Katja Markus has won 40.48%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Emily Seibold, in recent form, has won 49.64% of their opponent's second serve points, while Katja Markus has won 53.93%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.31% and 34.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Emily Seibold has saved 45.99% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Katja Markus has saved 45.65% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Emily Seibold has won 60.00% of matches played (W/L 36/24), with Katja Markus winning 40.00% (W/L 6/9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Emily Seibold has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 38/28), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 10/15). Katja Markus has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 36/48), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
- Player level: In the last year, Emily Seibold has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.10% of matches (W/L 23/18), where as Katja Markus has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 41.67% of matches (W/L 5/7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Emily Seibold winning 1 times and Katja Markus being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Emily Seibold winning 2 and Katja Markus winning 0.
- The last match between Emily Seibold and Katja Markus was at the W15 Sao Joao da Boa Vista, 13-03-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Emily Seibold getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:1:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Emily Seibold has played against opponents with an average rank of 424.15 while Katja Markus has played against players with an average rank of 244.6.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Emily Seibold has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Katja Markus has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Emily Seibold has converted 41.31% of breakpoint opportunities, and Katja Markus has converted 45.83% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Emily Seibold vs Katja Markus Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Seibold vs K. Markus H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:1:0 | Average Match Time | 1:1:0 |
| 60% (21/35) | 1st Serve % | 56% (22/39) |
| 76% (16/21) | 1st Serve Win % | 36% (8/22) |
| 71% (10/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 24% (4/17) |
| 100% (6/6) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 69% (27/39) | Return Points Win % | 26% (9/35) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Seibold 45%, Markus 37%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Seibold 59%, Markus 55%.
Break Points Saved %: Seibold 54%, Markus 48%.
E. Seibold Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 3-2 ret. | ||
K. Markus Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q3 | L | 3-6 7-5 15-13 | ||
Q2 | W | 7-6(3) 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-1 6-0 | ||

E. Seibold vs K. Markus Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.52% (199/166) | YTD Win/Loss | 40.66% (37/54) |
| 55.21% (445/361) | Sets Win/Loss | 42.36% (86/117) |
| 53.40% (3751/3274) | Games Win/Loss | 44.99% (849/1038) |
| 57.58% (38/28) | Hard Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 55.89% (147/116) | Clay Win/Loss | 42.86% (36/48) |
| 38.89% (14/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 464 | Aces Total | 14 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1057 | Total Double Faults | 183 |
| 1:19:31 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 465.62 | Average Opponent Rank | 215.59 |
| 61% (10481/17300) | 1st Serve % | 63% (2020/3192) |
| 60% (6313/10481) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (1042/2020) |
| 44% (3004/6819) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (458/1172) |
| 50% (1239/2460) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (168/353) |
| 48% (8647/17948) | Return Points Win % | 44% (1306/2960) |
| 47.80% (87/95) | Challenger W/L | 40.00% (18/27) |
| 61.20% (112/71) | Futures W/L | 41.30% (19/27) |
| 56% (196/350) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 41% (37/91) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 36% (18/50) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 72% (13/18) |
| 48% (41/85) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (9/21) |
| 89% (202/180) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (42/33) |
| 11% (202/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 21% (42/9) |
| 13% (163/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (49/4) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sat, 22 Nov, 01:30 PM
PredictionSat, 22 Nov, 10:30 AM
PredictionSat, 22 Nov, 01:30 AM
PredictionSat, 22 Nov, 05:00 AM
PredictionSat, 22 Nov, 06:30 AM
PredictionSat, 22 Nov, 12:00 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Talia Gibson Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Maria Lourdes Carle vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Sydney Challenger Preview And Prediction: James McCabe vs Rinky Hijikata Betting Tips & Picks November 21, 2025
Top Predictions Today
04:30
H2H 1-1
01:30
H2H 0-0
03:00
H2H 0-0
14:00
H2H 0-0
18:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Luanda
Angola