Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emily Appleton vs Anastasia Nefedova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Appleton vs Nefedova analysis and find out who is favored!
Emily Appleton vs Anastasia Nefedova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Appleton has won 46.8% of points on his second serve, while Nefedova has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Appleton, in recent form, has won 53.54% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nefedova has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.23% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Appleton has saved 56.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nefedova has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Appleton has won 53.85% of matches played (W/L 35/ 30), with Nefedova winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Appleton has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 43/ 38), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 7/ 15). Nefedova has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 152/ 117), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 111/ 114).
- Player level: In the last year, Appleton has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55% of matches (W/L 33/ 27), where as Nefedova has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Appleton winning 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Appleton winning 1 and Nefedova winning 4. The last match between Appleton and Nefedova was at the Charleston, 03-10-2018, First, Clay with Anastasia Nefedova getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:14:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Appleton and Nefedova have played a deciding set 1 times, with Appleton winning 0 times and Nefedova 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Appleton winning 0, and Nefedova 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Appleton has played against opponents with an average rank of 288.69 while Nefedova has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Appleton has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nefedova has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Appleton has converted 40.27% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nefedova has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Appleton 0 - 2 Nefedova
396
Rank
368
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard0
0
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
876
Rank
428
High
25
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
50% (178-176)
Career Total W/L
53% (271-240)
58% (15-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,804
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Emily Appleton | Anastasia Nefedova |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 4 |
| Games Won | 18 | 28 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 12 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:14:30 | 2:14:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (87/148) | 58% (83/143) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (54/87) | 71% (59/83) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 39% (24/61) | 48% (29/60) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 56% (10/18) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (55/143) | 47% (70/148) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Anastasia Nefedova
Player
Emily Appleton
46%
(
23 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
| 7-5 3-6 6-3 |
Stats
Anastasia Nefedova
Player
Emily Appleton
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
7
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
40 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emily Appleton | Anastasia Nefedova |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (15/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (31/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (267/266) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (12/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.69 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 179 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.57 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 150 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:55 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 283.31 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (957/1661) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (684/957) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (332/704) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (71/194) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (739/1821) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (15/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (15/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 86% (6/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (12/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (12/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Emily Appleton Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Emily Appleton
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
9
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Naima Karamoko
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
0
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
7
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Emily Appleton
82%
(
60 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Noelia Manta
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
22 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Ivana Corley
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
44%
(
34 of
77)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Manon Leonard
Player
Emily Appleton
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
43%
(
42 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
8
Aces
10
14
Double Faults
3
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
44%
(
24 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Ekaterina Yashina
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Olivia Gram
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
12
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Emily Appleton
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
5
Aces
10
7
Double Faults
6
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Anastasia Nefedova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jenna Defalco
Player
Anastasia Nefedova
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
4 of
26)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
47%
(
23 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anastasia Nefedova
Player
Olivia Gram
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriella Price
Player
Anastasia Nefedova
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
8
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sabine Lisicki
Player
Anastasia Nefedova
52%
(
50 of
97)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
96)
6
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
7
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
40%
(
19 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
46%
(
45 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francoise Abanda
Player
Anastasia Nefedova
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Nefedova
Player
Verginie Tchakarova
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
86)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
14
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
94
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Anastasia Nefedova
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kayla Day
Player
Anastasia Nefedova
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
4
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
69
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anastasia Nefedova
Player
Hana Evans
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve %
43%
(
12 of
28)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
86%
(
24 of
28)
50
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Whitney Osuigwe
Player
Anastasia Nefedova
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
5
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
27%
(
6 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
32 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Appleton Vs Nefedova Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
