Emilio Nava vs Roman Andres Burruchaga Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W L L
Form
W L L W W L W W L LH2H: Nava 2 - 0 Burruchaga
They have played 4 sets in total, with Nava winning 4 and Burruchaga winning 0. The last match between Nava and Burruchaga was at the Cordoba Challenger, 04-03-2025, First, Clay with Emilio Nava getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Emilio Nava | 2 |
| Roman Andres Burruchaga | 0 |
Cordoba Challenger(04-03-2025)
7
5
6
3
| Nava | Stats | Burruchaga |
|---|---|---|
| 74% (31-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 55% (17-14) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 132 | Ranking | 142 |
| 124 | Highest Rank | 123 |
| 23 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 6 | Titles | 4 |
| 60% (219-148) | Career Total W/L | 58% (198-143) |
| $442,385 | Career Prize Money | $165,905 |
| 3 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Gibert VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cobolli VS Rune PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Nava VS Burruchaga H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Emilio Nava
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
Nava VS Burruchaga H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 13 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 1:35:29 | Average Match Time | 1:35:29 |
| 60% (59/98) | 1st Serve % | 55% (71/130) |
| 88% (52/59) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (41/71) |
| 54% (21/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (31/59) |
| 44% (7/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 45% (58/130) | Return Points Win % | 26% (25/98) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Emilio Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Joel Schwaerzler
Player
Emilio Nava
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Emilio Nava
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
96)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Mathys Erhard
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Murphy Cassone
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
12
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Liam Draxl
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Eliot Spizzirri
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Tomas Barrios Vera
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
6
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Gabi Adrian Boitan
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Roman Andres Burruchaga Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
64%
(
71 of
111)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
9
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
48 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
48 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
111
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Conner Huertas Del Pino
54%
(
42 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
47 of
84)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Juan Bautista Torres
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
46%
(
39 of
84)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
78%
(
40 of
51)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
55%
(
52 of
94)
1st Serve %
56%
(
52 of
93)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
8
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
40 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Kilian Feldbausch
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
93)
0
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
5
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (219/148) | Win/Loss | 58% (198/143) |
| 56% (486/377) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (452/363) |
| 52% (4365/4060) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4007/3635) |
| 55% (89/73) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (35/26) |
| 68% (100/47) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (161/116) |
| 55% (28/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 29% (2/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) |
| 0.52 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 2139 | Aces Total | 536 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 1037 | Total Double Faults | 1212 |
| 1:36:39 | Average Match Time | 1:44:51 |
| 370.54 | Average Opponent Rank | 388.43 |
| 63% (15829/25307) | 1st Serve % | 62% (13987/22591) |
| 71% (11224/15829) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (9042/13987) |
| 51% (4880/9478) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (4102/8604) |
| 42% (941/2254) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1224/2592) |
| 38% (9600/25372) | Return Points Win % | 44% (9985/22786) |
| 55% (12/10) | Slam W/L | 55% (6/5) |
| 40% (8/12) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (9/12) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (10/10) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (142/88) | Challenger W/L | 58% (115/83) |
| 65% (48/26) | Futures W/L | 60% (67/44) |
| 60% (214/358) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (194/333) |
| 43% (3/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 48% (76/157) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (45/89) |
| 61% (74/121) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (75/132) |
| 86% (204/176) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (172/147) |
| 14% (204/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (172/24) |
| 26% (163/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 30% (169/50) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
