Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emilio Nava vs Matteo Martineau Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nava vs Martineau analysis and find out who is favored!
Emilio Nava vs Matteo Martineau Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nava has won 50.6% of points on his second serve, while Martineau has won 50.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nava, in recent form, has won 48.26% of his opponent's second serve points, while Martineau has won 48.52%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.97% and 30.81% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nava has saved 67.62% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Martineau has saved 63.27% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nava has won 61.54% of matches played (W/L 48/ 30), with Martineau winning 57.65% (W/L 49/ 36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nava has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 64/ 33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 24/ 20). Martineau has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 52/ 33), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Nava has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 32/ 20), where as Martineau has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.73% of matches (W/L 37/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nava winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nava winning 1 and Martineau winning 2. The last match between Nava and Martineau was at the M25 Reus, 18-04-2021, Final, Clay with Matteo Martineau getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:21:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nava and Martineau have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nava winning 0 times and Martineau 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Nava winning 0, and Martineau 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nava has played against opponents with an average rank of 293.17 while Martineau has played against players with an average rank of 269.35.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nava has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Martineau has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nava has converted 38.73% of breakpoint opportunities, and Martineau has converted 40.91% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nava 0 - 1 Martineau
124
Rank
124
High
22
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
183
Rank
183
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
60% (172-116)
Career Total W/L
56% (268-214)
58% (18-13)
YTD W/L
53% (16-14)
$402,385
Career Prize Money
$32,325
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Emilio Nava | Matteo Martineau |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 16 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:21:0 | 2:21:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (59/97) | 64% (63/99) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (39/59) | 68% (43/63) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 68% (26/38) | 50% (18/36) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 22% (2/9) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (38/99) | 33% (32/97) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 2-6 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Matteo Martineau
Player
Emilio Nava
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
1
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
38 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
93
Total Points Won
103
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emilio Nava | Matteo Martineau |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (18/13) | 53% (16/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (41/30) | 54% (40/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (375/344) | 51% (369/354) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 36% (4/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) | 67% (12/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.65 | 0.55 |
| Aces Total | 229 | 195 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 90 | 68 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:54 | 1:48:15 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 288.77 | 292.8 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1442/2309) | 69% (1527/2207) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (1031/1442) | 72% (1093/1527) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (446/867) | 50% (339/680) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (77/188) | 38% (78/203) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (790/2194) | 37% (843/2303) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 62% (8/5) | 59% (16/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (18/31) | 53% (16/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (5/15) | 54% (7/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 44% (4/9) | 43% (6/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 84% (19/16) | 86% (14/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 16% (19/3) | 14% (14/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 25% (16/4) |
Emilio Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexandre Muller
Player
Emilio Nava
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Emilio Nava
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
98)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
98)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
48%
(
40 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Emilio Nava
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Emilio Nava
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Mathys Erhard
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Emilio Nava
80%
(
66 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
57 of
79)
1
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
58 of
82)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Quentin Halys
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Matteo Martineau Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Matteo Martineau
37%
(
33 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
4
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
52%
(
29 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Matteo Martineau
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
106)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
106)
102
Total Points Won
99
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Dellien
Player
Matteo Martineau
80%
(
73 of
91)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Miedler
Player
Matteo Martineau
64%
(
69 of
108)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
94)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
50 of
69)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
37%
(
40 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
94)
101
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luca Nardi
Player
Matteo Martineau
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Franco Agamenone
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
110)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
6
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
110)
102
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nino Serdarusic
Player
Matteo Martineau
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Matteo Martineau
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Nava Vs Martineau Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
