Emilio Gomez vs Jason Jung Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
E. Gomez vs J. Jung

Emilio Gomez

ECU

2

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'1" (185 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

756

C. Rank

856

Best Rank

114

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$571.2K

Career Money

$350.6K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Jason Jung

TPE

2

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'1" (185 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

756

C. Rank

856

Best Rank

114

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$571.2K

Career Money

$350.6K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Gomez 2 - 1 Jung

They have played 6 sets in total, with Emilio Gomez winning 4 and Jason Jung winning 2. The last match between Jason Jung and Emilio Gomez was at the Savannah Challenger, 25-04-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Jason Jung getting the victory 6-2 4-4 ret..

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Gomez	2
Jung	1

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(R1) Savannah Challenger(04-25-22)

Stats

Jason Jung

Emilio Gomez

(R1) Cleveland Challenger(02-01-22)

Stats

Emilio Gomez

Jason Jung

(R3) Dallas Challenger(02-06-20)

Stats

Emilio Gomez

Jason Jung

E. Gomez vs J. Jung H2H Profile

E. Gomez	Stats	J. Jung
$571,180	Career Prize Money	$350,585
56.41% (427-330)	Career Total W/L	55.35% (414-334)
0	Clay	1
2	Indoor	0
14	Titles	8
2	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

E. Gomez vs J. Jung Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Emilio Gomez has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Jason Jung has won 46.12%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Emilio Gomez, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jason Jung has won 48.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Emilio Gomez has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jason Jung has saved 52.44% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Emilio Gomez has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Jason Jung winning 22.22% (W/L 2/7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Emilio Gomez has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 216/136), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 13% (W/L 1/7). Jason Jung has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 308/223), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 20/26).
Player level: In the last year, Emilio Gomez has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Jason Jung has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 22.22% of matches (W/L 2/7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Emilio Gomez winning 2 times and Jason Jung being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Emilio Gomez winning 4 and Jason Jung winning 2.
The last match between Emilio Gomez and Jason Jung was at the Savannah Challenger, 25-04-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Jason Jung getting the victory 6-2 4-4 ret..
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:47:43.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Emilio Gomez has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Jason Jung has played against players with an average rank of 326.33.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Emilio Gomez has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jason Jung has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Emilio Gomez has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jason Jung has converted 41.51% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Emilio Gomez vs Jason Jung Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

E. Gomez vs J. Jung H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

E. Gomez	Stats	J. Jung
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	2
35	Games Won	33
14	Aces (Total)	14
12	Total Double Faults	11
1:47:43	Average Match Time	1:47:43
61% (129/210)	1st Serve %	61% (146/241)
74% (95/129)	1st Serve Win %	63% (92/146)
46% (37/81)	2nd Serve Win %	56% (53/95)
43% (9/21)	Break Pts Won %	47% (9/19)
40% (96/241)	Return Points Win %	37% (78/210)
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	50% (1/2)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	50% (1/2)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

E. Gomez Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
M25 Edwardsville - 29-07-2024
R1 Felix CorwinF. Corwin	L	6-4 4-2 ret.	Stats
M25 Champaign - 22-07-2024
R1 Aidan MchughA. Mchugh	L	6-4 6-7(3) 6-3	Stats
M15 Rochester - 15-07-2024
R1 Nicholas GodsickN. Godsick	L	7-6(3) 6-4	Stats
Santa Cruz de la Sierra 2 Challenger - 17-06-2024
R1 Andrea CollariniA. Collarini	L	6-2 7-5	Stats
Lima 1 Challenger - 10-06-2024
Q1 Karue SellK. Sell	L	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

J. Jung Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Kobe Challenger - 10-11-2025
R1 Yoshihito NishiokaY. Nishioka	L	1-6 6-3 6-4	Stats
Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025
R2 Yoshihito NishiokaY. Nishioka	L	7-5 6-2	Stats
R1 Arthur WeberA. Weber	W	6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(6)	Stats
Suzhou Challenger - 20-10-2025
R1 James McCabeJ. McCabe	L	6-7(4) 6-4 6-2	Stats
Shenzhen Challenger - 13-10-2025
R2 Kaichi UchidaK. Uchida	L	6-3 2-0 ret.	Stats

View All

E. Gomez vs J. Jung Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

E. Gomez	Stats	J. Jung
56.41% (427/330)	YTD Win/Loss	55.35% (414/334)
55.41% (978/787)	Sets Win/Loss	54.67% (949/787)
51.89% (8718/8082)	Games Win/Loss	51.99% (8605/7946)
61.36% (216/136)	Hard Win/Loss	58.00% (308/223)
53.17% (176/155)	Clay Win/Loss	49.21% (31/32)
51.52% (34/32)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.93% (55/53)
12.50% (1/7)	Grass Win/Loss	43.48% (20/26)
0.23	Aces Per Game	0.24
1861	Aces Total	1949
0.24	Double Faults Per Game	0.2
1946	Total Double Faults	1621
1:17:42	Average Match Time	1:12:48
521.31	Average Opponent Rank	566.09
60% (25301/42238)	1st Serve %	63% (25533/40298)
68% (17304/25301)	1st Serve Win %	68% (17485/25533)
50% (8445/16937)	2nd Serve Win %	51% (7548/14765)
42% (1738/4098)	Break Points Won % (Total)	40% (1594/3943)
39% (16431/41644)	Return Points Win %	39% (16005/40933)
42.86% (15/20)	Slam W/L	38.89% (14/22)
50.00% (9/9)	Masters W/L	18.18% (2/9)
58.62% (17/12)	Cups W/L	40.00% (2/3)
42.86% (18/24)	Main Tour W/L	46.25% (37/43)
54.13% (236/200)	Challenger W/L	53.93% (240/205)
67.01% (132/65)	Futures W/L	69.59% (119/52)
56% (413/731)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	57% (409/720)
57% (12/21)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	9% (2/22)
55% (141/256)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	51% (122/241)
50% (114/228)	Deciding Set Win %	52% (113/218)
85% (438/374)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (416/352)
14% (438/63)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	15% (416/64)
16% (319/51)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	18% (331/61)