Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emil Ruusuvuori vs Daniel Evans Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ruusuvuori vs Evans analysis and find out who is favored!
Emil Ruusuvuori vs Daniel Evans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ruusuvuori 1 - 0 Evans
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ruusuvuori has won 54.98% of points on his second serve, while Evans has won 51.4%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ruusuvuori, in recent form, has won 51.31% of his opponent's second serve points, while Evans has won 49.71%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.97% and 26.49% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ruusuvuori has saved 62.71% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Evans has saved 59.09% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ruusuvuori has won 50.98% of matches played (W/L 26/ 25), with Evans winning 35.9% (W/L 14/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ruusuvuori has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 98/ 44), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 46/ 53). Evans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 164/ 98), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 47/ 53).
- Player level: In the last year, Ruusuvuori has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 59.26% of matches (W/L 16/ 11), where as Evans has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 29.41% of matches (W/L 5/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ruusuvuori winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ruusuvuori winning 2 and Evans winning 0. The last match between Ruusuvuori and Evans was at the Qatar ExxonMobil Open - Doha, 21-02-2023, First, Hard with Emil Ruusuvuori getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:52:38.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ruusuvuori and Evans have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ruusuvuori winning 0 times and Evans 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ruusuvuori winning 0, and Evans 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ruusuvuori has played against opponents with an average rank of 144.65 while Evans has played against players with an average rank of 154.82.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ruusuvuori has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Evans has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ruusuvuori has converted 35.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Evans has converted 28.57% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ruusuvuori 1 - 0 Evans
71
Rank
37
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
67
Rank
21
High
33
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
62% (274-171)
Career Total W/L
60% (552-372)
52% (12-11)
YTD W/L
29% (5-12)
$2,433,160
Career Prize Money
$4,736,130
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ruusuvuori VS Evans H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Emil Ruusuvuori | Daniel Evans |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:38 | 1:52:38 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (38/62) | 57% (39/69) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (29/38) | 69% (27/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (10/24) | 37% (11/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 100% (2/2) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (31/69) | 37% (23/62) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Ruusuvuori VS Evans H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Daniel Evans
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emil Ruusuvuori | Daniel Evans |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (12/11) | 29% (5/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (31/28) | 38% (16/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (304/293) | 46% (192/224) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) | 30% (3/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 29% (2/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.36 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 106 | 56 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 56 | 58 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:10 | 2:8:57 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 153.96 | 199.06 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1185/1915) | 57% (751/1321) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (829/1185) | 71% (531/751) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (402/730) | 51% (293/570) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (60/171) | 29% (32/112) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (728/1922) | 35% (480/1366) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/4) | 20% (1/4) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 69% (9/4) | 25% (2/6) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 67% (2/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (11/20) | 31% (5/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 62% (8/13) | 11% (1/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (5/10) | 17% (1/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (11/8) | 57% (7/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (11/3) | 43% (7/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (12/4) | 10% (10/1) |
Emil Ruusuvuori Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Francesco Passaro
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
28 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
59%
(
68 of
116)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
108)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
71)
65%
(
31 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
36 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
120
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(5) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcos Giron
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
58%
(
54 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
40 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
65%
(
67 of
103)
1st Serve %
69%
(
78 of
113)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
49 of
78)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
31 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(9) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
86
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
11
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
100%
(
5 of
5)
1st Serve %
71%
(
10 of
14)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
13
Total Points Won
6
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Christopher O'Connell
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
42 of
84)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
13 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Evans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Daniel Evans
68%
(
69 of
101)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
2
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Harold Mayot
49%
(
33 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Hugo Grenier
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Daniel Evans
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
5
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Daniel Evans
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Daniel Evans
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christopher Eubanks
Player
Daniel Evans
71%
(
78 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
21
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
53 of
63)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
35 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
21%
(
20 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
1
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
88)
80
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Daniel Evans
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
79)
11
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
89
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ruusuvuori Vs Evans Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Emil Ruusuvuori
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Daniel Evans
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
