Emanuel Ivanisevic vs Adam Jilly Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does Jilly's second serve compare to Ivanisevic's? Jilly has a slightly lower win rate of 46.49% compared to Ivanisevic's 50.91%.
• In return games, Jilly excels by winning 50.79% of points on their opponent's second serve, outperforming Ivanisevic, who wins 39.73%.
• Regarding first serve returns, Jilly also leads with 30.58%, narrowly surpassing Ivanisevic's 28.97%.
• When it comes to handling pressure, Jilly saves 66% of breakpoints, while Ivanisevic saves 62.86%.
• Overall match performance over the last year favors Jilly, with a win rate of 61.76%, whereas Ivanisevic stands at 50%.
• On different surfaces, Jilly performs best on Hard courts with a 62% win rate, while Ivanisevic's best is on Clay, albeit with only a 38% win rate.
• Both players mostly compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, though Jilly has a slightly higher success rate of 61.76% compared to Ivanisevic's 57.14%.
• Jilly typically plays opponents ranked around 275.44, slightly lower than Ivanisevic's average opponent rank of 255.75, indicating a potentially tougher competition for Ivanisevic.
• In deciding sets, Jilly has a small edge, winning 55% compared to Ivanisevic's 50% win rate.
• Which player is more effective at break point opportunities? Jilly converts at a rate of 50%, compared to Ivanisevic's 45.45%.

Editorial Prediction (June 25, 2025, UTC):

Based on recent statistics, Jilly appears to have a slight advantage in this upcoming match. Their performance on return games and higher breakpoint conversion rate suggest stronger resilience and strategic play.

While Ivanisevic holds a marginally better win percentage on second serves, Jilly compensates with a more robust ability to manage high-pressure situations effectively. Additionally, Jilly's tendency to win more often against similar-tier opponents boosts their potential as a favorite.

In light of these factors, Jilly is likely to be the favorite to win this match, given their consistent performance across multiple competitive aspects.