Elsa Wan vs Yujin Ahn Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

When it comes to second serve prowess, the numbers never lie. Over the past six months, Wan has managed to secure only 28.57% of points on their second serve. In comparison, Ahn edges ahead with 31.9%. Can these stats help us foresee the winner? The relation between second serve success and match outcomes is strong.

Now, how about the return game? Recent stats reveal that Wan has thrived by winning 63.33% of their opponent’s second serve points. Ahn, on the other hand, registers at 56.58%. The tables turn with first serve returns, as Ahn boasts a 39.44% success rate compared to Wan’s 27.27%. Crucial figures when determining a viable favorite in this head-to-head skirmish!

Pressure situations are another story. Under the heat, Wan falters with a 0% breakpoint save rate, contrasted sharply by Ahn’s commendable 43.84%. Such information could be a goldmine for those indulging in in-game bets, as it offers insights into each player's resilience.

In terms of overall match performance over the last year, Wan has a slight edge, boasting a win rate of 66.67% (W/L 8/4). Ahn’s record comes in at a more modest 50% (W/L 16/16). This gives us a broader view of the head-to-head dynamic.

The surface on which the match unfolds is vital. Both players exhibit their best career win rates on hard courts—Wan at 61% and Ahn at 57%. Interestingly, both have an equal struggle on indoor hard courts, rendering a 0% win rate.

Game level competition tells another tale. Wan predominantly contests in Challengers/ITF events, winning 71.43%, while Ahn navigates Futures/Satellites circuits, emerging victorious 57.69% of the time. These comparisons come with a reminder that event level plays a role in gauging favoritism.

The caliber of competition each has faced also sways predictions. Over the year, Wan’s opponents average a rank of 45.33; meanwhile, Ahn’s trail behind at 122.59. Could this disparity signal Wan’s readiness in high-stakes situations?

If the duel advances to a deciding set, Wan’s advantage emerges again: a 67% triumph rate, whereas Ahn stands at 50%. This could be pivotal for those casting live predictions.

In analyzing break point conversion, Wan has capitalized on 33.33% of opportunities, while Ahn outshines with 52.27%. Breakpoint performance serves as a cornerstone for in-game betting decisions when the pressure mounts.

Based on the data, Ahn may have the upper hand, though Wan's performance, especially in deciding sets, shouldn't be dismissed. The statistical edge, especially in critical moments, suggests Ahn as the likely victor in this encounter.