Ella Seidel vs Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Oct at 10:59 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Seidel vs T. Rakotomanga Rajaonah

 GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

 FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Seidel 1 - 0 Rajaonah
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ella Seidel winning 2 and Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah winning 0. The last match between Ella Seidel and Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah was at the Jiangxi Open - Jiujiang, 27-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Ella Seidel getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Seidel | 1 | 
| Rajaonah | 0 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Jiangxi Open - Jiujiang(10-27-25)
E. Seidel vs T. R. Rajaonah H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $462,357 | Career Prize Money | $40,460 | 
| 60.56% (152-99) | Career Total W/L | 61.73% (121-75) | 
| 1 | Hard | 0 | 
| 5 | Titles | 5 | 
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 | 
| 60.00% (12-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 66.67% (8-4) | 
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 | 
E. Seidel vs T. R. Rajaonah Match Preview:
- In terms of second serve performance over the last six months, Ella Seidel has been slightly more successful, winning 43.16% of points compared to Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah's 37.81%.
- When it comes to return game performance on an opponent's second serve, both players show similar strength, with Seidel winning 51.88% of points and Rajaonah at 52.11%.
- However, Rajaonah is better at returning first serves, evidenced by her 36.19% return rate compared to Seidel's 30.36%. Could this be an advantage for Rajaonah?
- Considering pressure situations, Seidel is slightly more adept at saving breakpoints, with a 49.21% save rate compared to Rajaonah's 45.71%.
- Looking at overall match performance in the past year, Ella Seidel has a marginally better win rate (60.56%) than Rajaonah (60%).
- Seidel's preferred surface is indoor hard courts with a 69% win rate, whereas Rajaonah excels on clay, also with a 69% win rate.
- On hard surfaces, where Seidel falters with only a 45% win rate on grass, Rajaonah struggles on hard courts, holding a 52% win rate.
- Seidel has primarily competed on the main tour, winning 62.50% of such matches, while Rajaonah has frequently competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments, with a win rate of 57.41%.
- When considering the level of competition, Seidel's opponents have had a higher average rank of 192.66 compared to Rajaonah's opponents averaging 257.36.
- In deciding sets, Rajaonah has a 65% success rate, slightly outshining Seidel's 59%. Is Rajaonah better in clutch moments?
- Past performance statistics should be complemented by current event stats, which can indicate in-form players.
Editorial Prediction (October 26, 2025, UTC):
Both players have shown commendable performance statistics in different aspects of their game. Ella Seidel has a slight edge with her second serve performance and ability to handle breakpoints more effectively. Furthermore, her experience in higher-level main tour matches, despite weaker results on grass, may contribute to her advantage.
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah's strength lies in her first serve returns and her ability to win in high-pressure, deciding set scenarios. Her success on clay demonstrates a specific surface proficiency, whereas her overall competition has been against lower-ranked opponents.
Given these factors, while both players present compelling cases, Ella Seidel seems to have a marginally stronger position going into this match. Considering her current form and level of competition she regularly faces, Ella Seidel is predicted to be the likely winner.
Ella Seidel vs Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Seidel vs T. R. Rajaonah H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 | 
| 12 | Games Won | 7 | 
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 | 
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 5 | 
| 1:19:1 | Average Match Time | 1:19:1 | 
| 50% (29/58) | 1st Serve % | 59% (33/56) | 
| 79% (23/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (16/33) | 
| 34% (10/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (8/23) | 
| 67% (6/9) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (3/6) | 
| 57% (32/56) | Return Points Win % | 43% (25/58) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) | 
Recent Performance Stats
E. Seidel Recent Matches Played
T. R. Rajaonah Recent Matches Played

E. Seidel vs T. R. Rajaonah Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.56% (152/99) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.73% (121/75) | 
| 58.25% (339/243) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.37% (265/189) | 
| 52.71% (2799/2511) | Games Win/Loss | 53.73% (2262/1948) | 
| 64.15% (34/19) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (16/16) | 
| 56.69% (72/55) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.94% (91/47) | 
| 68.33% (41/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.85% (14/12) | 
| 45.45% (5/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 | 
| 598 | Aces Total | 203 | 
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.37 | 
| 978 | Total Double Faults | 767 | 
| 1:33:31 | Average Match Time | 1:33:43 | 
| 316.55 | Average Opponent Rank | 382.63 | 
| 59% (9620/16415) | 1st Serve % | 65% (8064/12437) | 
| 65% (6258/9620) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (4866/8064) | 
| 46% (3112/6806) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1917/4373) | 
| 46% (953/2093) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (847/1713) | 
| 45% (7434/16621) | Return Points Win % | 48% (6025/12575) | 
| 60.00% (12/8) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/3) | 
| 75.00% (9/3) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 51.02% (25/24) | Main Tour W/L | 73.33% (11/4) | 
| 63.19% (103/60) | Challenger W/L | 54.10% (66/56) | 
| 42.86% (3/4) | Futures W/L | 78.57% (44/12) | 
| 61% (149/246) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (119/194) | 
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 
| 53% (25/47) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (25/47) | 
| 55% (44/80) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (39/64) | 
| 85% (155/131) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (108/98) | 
| 15% (155/23) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (108/10) | 
| 21% (96/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (88/23) | 












