Elizabeth Coleman vs Darja Suvirdjonkova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Elizabeth Coleman has a slight advantage over Darja Suvirdjonkova, winning 38.31% of points on her second serve compared to 34.64% for Suvirdjonkova. Does this suggest a key edge for Coleman in service games?
• Return Game: Suvirdjonkova excels in return games, capturing 53.21% of points on opponents' second serves, compared to Coleman's 48.55%. On first serve returns, Suvirdjonkova also leads with a 35.09% success rate against Coleman's 33.79%.
• Under Pressure: Handling pressure situations better, Suvirdjonkova saves 49.50% of breakpoints, edging slightly past Coleman's 46.49% save rate. Is this a crucial factor under pressure?
• Overall Performance: Over the past year, Coleman has a stronger overall win rate at 70.83% (17/7), whereas Suvirdjonkova stands at 48.33% (29/31).
• Surface Preferences: Suvirdjonkova performs best on Hard courts with a win rate of 46%, while Coleman has her best results on Clay courts at a 46% win rate.
• Tour Level: Coleman shows dominance at the ITF $10K level, winning 76.92% of her matches compared to Suvirdjonkova’s 45.16%. Does Coleman’s experience translate to higher performances in similar settings?
• Opponent Quality: Suvirdjonkova faces tougher opponents, with an average rank of 221.22, while Coleman’s opponents average ranks are 325.92. Does this indicate Suvirdjonkova’s ability to compete with tougher competition?
• Deciding Sets: Coleman is highly effective in deciding sets, winning 83% compared to Suvirdjonkova’s 36% success rate. Could this be decisive if the match goes deep?
• Breakpoint Conversion: Both players show similar proficiency, with Suvirdjonkova converting 48.28% and Coleman 47.27% of breakpoint opportunities.

Editorial Prediction (November 25, 2025, UTC):

When examining the statistics, Elizabeth Coleman showcases a slightly stronger second serve performance, which can be an important asset in maintaining control during service games. Additionally, her success percentage in deciding sets indicates mental resilience and the ability to close out tight matches effectively.

Conversely, Darja Suvirdjonkova holds an advantage in return games and demonstrates strength under pressure by saving marginally more breakpoints. This reflects her capability to challenge her opponent’s service games and potentially turn matches around through break opportunities.

However, Coleman’s recent winning streak and superior overall performance at the ITF $10K level, combined with her ability to overpower contests in deciding sets, position her as the likely winner in this upcoming match against Suvirdjonkova.