Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Elise Mertens vs Nadia Podoroska Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mertens vs Podoroska analysis and find out who is favored!
Elise Mertens vs Nadia Podoroska Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mertens has won 47.7% of points on his second serve, while Podoroska has won 45.13%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mertens, in recent form, has won 58.98% of his opponent's second serve points, while Podoroska has won 55.35%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.41% and 36.25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mertens has saved 55.29% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Podoroska has saved 57.21% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mertens has won 56.6% of matches played (W/L 30/ 23), with Podoroska winning 51.47% (W/L 35/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mertens has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 254/ 128), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 53% (W/L 31/ 27). Podoroska has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 249/ 125), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Mertens has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 64% of matches (W/L 16/ 9), where as Podoroska has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 43.33% of matches (W/L 13/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Mertens winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Mertens winning 4 and Podoroska winning 0. The last match between Mertens and Podoroska was at the Western & Southern Open - Cincinnati, 16-08-2021, First, Hard with Elise Mertens getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mertens and Podoroska have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mertens winning 0 times and Podoroska 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mertens winning 0, and Podoroska 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mertens has played against opponents with an average rank of 120.72 while Podoroska has played against players with an average rank of 164.75.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mertens has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Podoroska has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mertens has converted 48.82% of breakpoint opportunities, and Podoroska has converted 38.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mertens 2 - 0 Podoroska
30
Rank
12
High
28
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
65
Rank
36
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
64% (432-246)
Career Total W/L
63% (381-226)
57% (13-10)
YTD W/L
50% (11-11)
$7,910,108
Career Prize Money
$1,547,821
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Elise Mertens | Nadia Podoroska |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:0 | 1:34:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (68/121) | 56% (73/130) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (46/68) | 60% (44/73) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (27/53) | 35% (20/57) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (10/20) | 36% (4/11) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (66/130) | 40% (48/121) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Elise Mertens
Player
Nadia Podoroska
52%
(
37 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Nadia Podoroska
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Elise Mertens | Nadia Podoroska |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (13/10) | 50% (11/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (29/24) | 48% (24/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (239/222) | 50% (229/232) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 46% (6/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 71% (5/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.31 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 70 | 25 |
| DFs per game | 0.43 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 97 | 74 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:3 | 1:34:52 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 123.43 | 183.73 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (796/1411) | 66% (916/1385) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (534/796) | 63% (577/916) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (290/615) | 43% (203/469) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (85/175) | 38% (73/191) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (633/1466) | 44% (659/1498) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 43% (3/4) | 57% (4/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 64% (9/5) | 13% (1/7) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (5/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (13/23) | 50% (11/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 63% (5/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (14/12) | 89% (9/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (14/2) | 11% (9/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 23% (13/3) |
Elise Mertens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Elise Mertens
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Tatjana Maria
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Elise Mertens
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Elina Svitolina
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
25 of
35)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Varvara Gracheva
47%
(
46 of
97)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
44 of
67)
47%
(
24 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
97
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taylor Townsend
Player
Elise Mertens
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
46%
(
22 of
48)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Elise Mertens
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
18%
(
2 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Naomi Osaka
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
38%
(
29 of
76)
5
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
6
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
17 of
47)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Xinyu Wang
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
Player
Elise Mertens
77%
(
75 of
98)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Nadia Podoroska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Nadia Podoroska
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Nadia Podoroska
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Francesca Jones
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
27 of
38)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
69%
(
71 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
89 of
138)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
10
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
52 of
89)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
65 of
138)
127
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Marina Stakusic
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
79)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
12
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Mccartney Kessler
59%
(
65 of
110)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
104)
0
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
10
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
38%
(
17 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
45 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
112
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Nadia Podoroska
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Julia Riera
69%
(
71 of
103)
1st Serve %
57%
(
61 of
107)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
107)
114
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Nadia Podoroska
48%
(
22 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Mertens Vs Podoroska Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
