Elena Malygina vs Camilla Rosatello Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 30 Oct at 11:55 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Malygina vs C. Rosatello

EST
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Malygina 1 - 0 Rosatello
They have played 2 sets in total, with Elena Malygina winning 2 and Camilla Rosatello winning 0. The last match between Elena Malygina and Camilla Rosatello was at the W75 Glasgow, 30-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Elena Malygina getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Malygina | 1 |
| Rosatello | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W75 Glasgow(10-30-25)
E. Malygina vs C. Rosatello H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $4,461 | Career Prize Money | $49,841 |
| 58.60% (259-183) | Career Total W/L | 56.82% (400-304) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 33.33% (1-2) |
E. Malygina vs C. Rosatello Match Preview:
- Camilla Rosatello has a stronger second serve performance, having won 44.50% of points compared to Elena Malygina's 38.54% in the last 6 months. Why is this important? In tennis, solid second serve stats often correlate with winning matches.
- When returning opponents' serves, Malygina leads slightly in second serve returns with a 51.76% success rate, surpassing Rosatello's 51.07%. Will this influence the match outcome? It might, although first serve returns favor Malygina with 35.08% over Rosatello's 29.01%.
- Under pressure, Rosatello outperforms by saving 54.32% of breakpoints, compared to Malygina's 47.33%. This ability to handle critical moments can be pivotal.
- Over the past year, Rosatello has a higher match win rate (64.41%) compared to Malygina's 59.09%, suggesting better overall performance.
- Both players excel on I.hard surfaces, each holding a win rate of 58%. However, Malygina struggles more on clay, with a lower win percentage than Rosatello's on her weakest surface, grass.
- In terms of event level, Rosatello has been slightly more successful in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, achieving a win rate of 63.46% as opposed to Malygina's 53.33%.
- Contending against higher-ranked opponents, Rosatello has faced stronger competition with an average opponent rank of 337.14, while Malygina's opponents average at 363.57.
- In deciding sets over the last 12 months, Rosatello is significantly more successful, winning 68% versus Malygina's 23%.
Editorial Prediction (October 30, 2025, UTC):
With Camilla Rosatello's superior performance in second serves and breakpoint saves, she exhibits a significant advantage that could prove decisive in the upcoming match. Her ability to perform under pressure is notably better than Elena Malygina's.
Despite Malygina's slightly better return game on first serves, the overall consistent performance metrics favor Rosatello. Her greater success against higher-ranked opponents further highlights her competitive edge.
Considering all factors, including better deciding set performance, Camilla Rosatello is well-positioned to win this match against Elena Malygina.
Elena Malygina vs Camilla Rosatello Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Malygina vs C. Rosatello H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:3:44 | Average Match Time | 1:3:44 |
| 64% (32/50) | 1st Serve % | 52% (24/46) |
| 75% (24/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (15/24) |
| 56% (10/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (9/22) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 48% (22/46) | Return Points Win % | 32% (16/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Malygina Recent Matches Played
C. Rosatello Recent Matches Played

E. Malygina vs C. Rosatello Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.60% (259/183) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.82% (400/304) |
| 57.87% (588/428) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.22% (889/721) |
| 53.56% (4938/4282) | Games Win/Loss | 52.29% (7685/7012) |
| 58.18% (32/23) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.00% (88/72) |
| 55.87% (119/94) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.60% (250/184) |
| 62.07% (108/66) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.41% (62/46) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 255 | Aces Total | 872 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1029 | Total Double Faults | 1647 |
| 1:29:26 | Average Match Time | 1:5:10 |
| 461.57 | Average Opponent Rank | 514.61 |
| 68% (17454/25760) | 1st Serve % | 59% (18755/31633) |
| 58% (10046/17454) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (11659/18755) |
| 47% (3879/8306) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (5636/12878) |
| 50% (1813/3656) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1987/4186) |
| 48% (12703/26244) | Return Points Win % | 46% (15146/32744) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 10.00% (1/9) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 37.50% (3/5) | Main Tour W/L | 46.88% (15/17) |
| 56.40% (141/109) | Challenger W/L | 56.24% (266/207) |
| 65.52% (114/60) | Futures W/L | 60.51% (118/77) |
| 59% (257/439) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (395/692) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 47% (44/93) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (73/143) |
| 47% (61/131) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (119/213) |
| 85% (277/236) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (372/330) |
| 14% (277/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (372/41) |
| 13% (165/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (331/69) |