Ekaterine Gorgodze vs Miriana Tona Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Oct at 05:05 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Gorgodze vs M. Tona

GEO
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Gorgodze 1 - 0 Tona
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ekaterine Gorgodze winning 2 and Miriana Tona winning 0. The last match between Ekaterine Gorgodze and Miriana Tona was at the Engie Open - Florianopolis, 21-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Ekaterine Gorgodze getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gorgodze | 1 |
| Tona | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Engie Open - Florianopolis(10-21-25)
E. Gorgodze vs M. Tona H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $346,247 | Career Prize Money | $3,110 |
| 57.16% (591-443) | Career Total W/L | 53.32% (233-204) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 19 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
E. Gorgodze vs M. Tona Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Ekaterine Gorgodze wins 39.57% of second serve points compared to Miriana Tona's 38.31%. Does this slight edge suggest Gorgodze might capitalize on second serve situations? It might.
- Return Game Efficiency: Tona has a slight advantage in return games, winning 54.73% of second serve return points over Gorgodze's 53.11%. However, Gorgodze leads first serve returns with 38.56% wins against Tona’s 34.49%.
- Handling Pressure: Gorgodze saves 48.01% of breakpoints compared to Tona's 45.22%. Could this resilience under pressure tip the scales in her favor?
- Overall Performance: In the past year, Gorgodze has a 60.49% match win rate, slightly edging out Tona’s 59.26%.
- Surface Preference: Both players perform best on Clay, each with a 61% win rate. Might this trend play a decisive role if the match is on this surface?
- Competition Level: Tona appears more experienced against higher-ranked opponents, facing an average rank of 177.94 compared to Gorgodze's 330.72.
- Deciding Set Performance: In deciding set situations, Tona wins 64% of the time, distinctly outperforming Gorgodze's 41%. This could be crucial if the match is tightly contested.
Editorial Prediction (October 21, 2025, UTC):
Assessing each player's recent trends, strengths, and weaknesses, Ekaterine Gorgodze shows slightly better performance on second serves and under pressure with breakpoint saves. However, Miriana Tona has a significant advantage in deciding sets and against higher-caliber opponents, suggesting readiness for challenging matches.
Both players excel on clay, which may neutralize any surface advantage. Yet, Tona's ability to win crucial points, especially in tight matches, and her more frequent exposure to higher-ranked players suggest a slight edge in overcoming varied match conditions.
Given these factors, while both competitors have noteworthy strengths, Miriana Tona is the likely favorite to win in this closely contested matchup.
Ekaterine Gorgodze vs Miriana Tona Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Gorgodze vs M. Tona H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:22:57 | Average Match Time | 1:22:57 |
| 79% (46/58) | 1st Serve % | 58% (39/67) |
| 67% (31/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (18/39) |
| 42% (5/12) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (13/28) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 13% (1/8) |
| 54% (36/67) | Return Points Win % | 38% (22/58) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Gorgodze Recent Matches Played
M. Tona Recent Matches Played

E. Gorgodze vs M. Tona Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.16% (591/443) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.32% (233/204) |
| 56.95% (1364/1031) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.16% (527/446) |
| 53.36% (11472/10026) | Games Win/Loss | 51.97% (4376/4045) |
| 52.48% (106/96) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.28% (40/38) |
| 61.06% (461/294) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.52% (175/146) |
| 30.56% (22/50) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47.37% (18/20) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 551 | Aces Total | 549 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 1043 | Total Double Faults | 1379 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:16:55 |
| 532.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 486.93 |
| 74% (29706/39979) | 1st Serve % | 61% (13050/21226) |
| 57% (16994/29706) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (7918/13050) |
| 46% (4739/10273) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (3608/8176) |
| 50% (2743/5519) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1402/2803) |
| 48% (19531/40607) | Return Points Win % | 47% (9930/21063) |
| 37.04% (10/17) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 36.84% (7/12) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 34.21% (13/25) | Main Tour W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 53.76% (336/289) | Challenger W/L | 53.37% (95/83) |
| 69.69% (223/97) | Futures W/L | 53.54% (136/118) |
| 57% (581/1018) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (227/428) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (88/187) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (28/54) |
| 44% (150/341) | Deciding Set Win % | 39% (42/109) |
| 81% (641/521) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (249/212) |
| 18% (641/118) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (249/37) |
| 18% (393/69) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (187/21) |