Eero Vasa vs Carl Emil Overbeck Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Sep at 03:53 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Vasa vs C. Emil Overbeck

FIN
2
Win
Played
0
Win

DEN
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Vasa 2 - 0 Overbeck
They have played 5 sets in total, with Eero Vasa winning 4 and Carl Emil Overbeck winning 1. The last match between Eero Vasa and Carl Emil Overbeck was at the M25 Falun, 26-09-2025, Round: SF, Surface: I.hard, with Eero Vasa getting the victory 6-4 7-6(3).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Vasa | 2 |
| Overbeck | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(SF) M25 Falun(09-26-25)
(R2) M25 Varnamo(06-12-25)
E. Vasa vs C. E. Overbeck H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.46% (198-159) | Career Total W/L | 64.38% (47-26) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 33.33% (1-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. Vasa vs C. E. Overbeck Match Preview:
- Eero Vasa has shown a stronger second serve performance, winning 46.09% of points in recent months, compared to Carl Emil Overbeck's 42.44%. Could this edge affect the match outcome?
- In return games, Carl Emil Overbeck excels, winning 48.72% of opponents' second serve points, while Eero Vasa wins 44.29%.
- The ability to save breakpoints is nearly identical, with Vasa at 51.56% and Overbeck at 50.00%.
- Eero Vasa has a slightly higher match win rate over the past year, securing 59.09% of matches compared to Overbeck’s 54.55%.
- Surface preferences differ: Vasa is more successful on clay with a 58% win rate, whereas Overbeck has a perfect 100% win rate on indoor hard courts.
- Both players frequently play at the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K level, with Vasa winning 62.00% and Overbeck 60.00% of matches there.
- Eero Vasa leads the direct head-to-head record, having won their only previous encounter on clay.
- When contests go to a deciding set, Vasa has a stronger record, winning 63% compared to Overbeck's 50% over the past year.
- Both players have faced opponents of similar average ranks, Vasa encountering slightly tougher competition with an average rank of 416.53.
Editorial Prediction (September 26, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performance stats, Eero Vasa holds a slight advantage in second serve consistency, which could be critical in pivotal moments.
While Carl Emil Overbeck is formidable in return games, particularly against opponents' second serves, Eero Vasa's efficiency in saving breakpoints provides an edge in maintaining crucial service games.
Vasa's additional experience on clay, his preferred surface, and a superior record in deciding sets, further solidify his position as the likely favorite.
These factors combined, despite the competences Overbeck possesses, indicate Eero Vasa as the most likely victor in their upcoming matchup.
Eero Vasa vs Carl Emil Overbeck Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Vasa vs C. E. Overbeck H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 26 | Games Won | 23 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:39:36 | Average Match Time | 1:39:36 |
| 50% (77/155) | 1st Serve % | 60% (85/141) |
| 75% (58/77) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (62/85) |
| 55% (43/78) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (30/56) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Pts Won % | 36% (5/14) |
| 35% (49/141) | Return Points Win % | 35% (54/155) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Vasa Recent Matches Played
C. E. Overbeck Recent Matches Played

E. Vasa vs C. E. Overbeck Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.46% (198/159) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.38% (47/26) |
| 54.74% (450/372) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.35% (100/63) |
| 52.39% (4129/3753) | Games Win/Loss | 54.92% (837/687) |
| 56.47% (48/37) | Hard Win/Loss | 75.00% (15/5) |
| 58.25% (113/81) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.42% (29/19) |
| 47.44% (37/41) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 1152 | Aces Total | 217 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 750 | Total Double Faults | 167 |
| 1:2:53 | Average Match Time | 1:13:4 |
| 383.73 | Average Opponent Rank | 308.97 |
| 62% (9932/16147) | 1st Serve % | 64% (2298/3590) |
| 69% (6826/9932) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (1553/2298) |
| 49% (3031/6215) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (607/1292) |
| 42% (637/1508) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (174/395) |
| 39% (6239/16051) | Return Points Win % | 42% (1505/3562) |
| 18.18% (2/9) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 32.26% (10/21) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 59.05% (186/129) | Futures W/L | 65.67% (44/23) |
| 56% (197/352) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (47/73) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (41/94) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (5/11) |
| 50% (53/105) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (11/17) |
| 85% (206/176) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 95% (41/39) |
| 14% (206/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 5% (41/2) |
| 15% (151/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (32/8) |