Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Eduardo Nava vs Philip Henning Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nava vs Henning analysis and find out who is favored!
Eduardo Nava vs Philip Henning Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nava has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Henning has won 59.02%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nava, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Henning has won 57.04%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 37.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nava has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Henning has saved 61.83% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nava has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Henning winning 84.78% (W/L 39/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nava has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 7/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11). Henning has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 83% (W/L 5/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nava winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nava winning 2 and Henning winning 0. The last match between Nava and Henning was at the M25 Austin, 19-11-2021, Quarterfinals, Hard with Eduardo Nava getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:24:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nava and Henning have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nava winning 0 times and Henning 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nava winning 0, and Henning 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nava has played against opponents with an average rank of while Henning has played against players with an average rank of 111.41.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nava has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Henning has won 70% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nava has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Henning has converted 49.76% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nava 1 - 0 Henning
842
Rank
792
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
567
Rank
565
High
23
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
54% (77-66)
Career Total W/L
79% (48-13)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
84% (16-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Eduardo Nava | Philip Henning |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:24:0 | 1:24:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (30/53) | 62% (34/55) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (20/30) | 47% (16/34) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 61% (14/23) | 38% (8/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 56% (31/55) | 36% (19/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Eduardo Nava
Player
Philip Henning
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Eduardo Nava | Philip Henning |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 84% (16/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 77% (33/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 59% (237/164) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 92% (12/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 55 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.09 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 17 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:45:37 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 94.11 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 70% (863/1233) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 66% (573/863) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (210/370) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 48% (78/161) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (601/1326) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 84% (16/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 84% (16/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 80% (4/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 93% (14/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 7% (14/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 60% (5/3) |
Eduardo Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Matej Vocel
Player
Eduardo Nava
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
29 of
62)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eduardo Nava
Player
Brandon Carpico
45%
(
30 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Robin Catry
Player
Eduardo Nava
58%
(
56 of
96)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
86)
9
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eduardo Nava
Player
Filippo Moroni
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eduardo Nava
Player
Jesse Flores
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Eduardo Nava
56%
(
63 of
112)
1st Serve %
55%
(
82 of
149)
14
Aces
12
6
Double Faults
10
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
60 of
82)
45%
(
22 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
17%
(
3 of
18)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
40 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
60 of
149)
132
Total Points Won
129
|
7-6(4) 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cash Hanzlik
Player
Eduardo Nava
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Donald Young
Player
Eduardo Nava
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Eduardo Nava
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
10
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
96%
(
25 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Bertran
Player
Eduardo Nava
63%
(
83 of
132)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
44%
(
58 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Philip Henning Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Philip Henning
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
81%
(
44 of
54)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Aleksandre Metreveli
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
71%
(
58 of
82)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
36 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Kokoro Isomura
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
75%
(
80 of
106)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
106)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Manuel Mazza
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Mikhail Korovin
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
85%
(
22 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriele Bosio
Player
Philip Henning
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Philip Henning
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
73 of
106)
10
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
0
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
44 of
73)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
106)
96
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Vadym Ursu
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Nicolas Jadoun
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
2
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Faris Zakaryia
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Nava Vs Henning Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
