Prediction of Eduard Esteve Lobato vs David Pamminger Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Esteve Lobato vs D. Pamminger

Eduard Esteve Lobato
ESP
w
l
l
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
31
Age
33
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
-
841
C. Rank
Ret.
271
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

David Pamminger
AUT
w
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
31
Age
33
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
-
841
C. Rank
Ret.
271
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Lobato 1 - 0 Pamminger
They have played 3 sets in total, with Eduard Esteve Lobato winning 2 and David Pamminger winning 1. The last match between Eduard Esteve Lobato and David Pamminger was at the Morocco F6, 23-11-2015, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Eduard Esteve Lobato getting the victory 6-0 3-6 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lobato | 1 |
| Pamminger | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Morocco F6(11-23-15)
Eduard Esteve Lobato
6
3
6
David Pamminger
0
6
1
E. E. Lobato vs D. Pamminger H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 57.94% (332-241) | Career Total W/L | 42.65% (29-39) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 8 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. E. Lobato vs D. Pamminger Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Eduard Esteve Lobato has won 0% of points on their second serve, while David Pamminger has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Eduard Esteve Lobato, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while David Pamminger has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Eduard Esteve Lobato has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas David Pamminger has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Eduard Esteve Lobato has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with David Pamminger winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Eduard Esteve Lobato has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 313/217), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). David Pamminger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 24/32), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 42% (W/L 5/7).
- Player level: In the last year, Eduard Esteve Lobato has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as David Pamminger has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Eduard Esteve Lobato winning 1 times and David Pamminger being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Eduard Esteve Lobato winning 2 and David Pamminger winning 1.
- The last match between Eduard Esteve Lobato and David Pamminger was at the Morocco F6, 23-11-2015, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Eduard Esteve Lobato getting the victory 6-0 3-6 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:49:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Eduard Esteve Lobato has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while David Pamminger has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Eduard Esteve Lobato has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while David Pamminger has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Eduard Esteve Lobato has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and David Pamminger has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Eduard Esteve Lobato vs David Pamminger Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. E. Lobato vs D. Pamminger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 7 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:49:0 | Average Match Time | 1:49:0 |
| 64% (45/70) | 1st Serve % | 58% (45/78) |
| 64% (29/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (24/45) |
| 40% (10/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (14/33) |
| 58% (7/12) | Break Pts Won % | 75% (3/4) |
| 51% (40/78) | Return Points Win % | 44% (31/70) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Lobato 0%, Pamminger 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Lobato 0%, Pamminger 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Lobato 0%, Pamminger 0%.
E. E. Lobato Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 2-6 6-3 7-6(2) | ||
Q3 | L | 3-6 6-4 0-1 ret. | ||
Q1 | W | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 7-5 3-1 ret. | ||
D. Pamminger Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | W | 6-1 7-5 | ||
Q3 | L | 4-6 0-4 ret. | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-0 3-6 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||

E. E. Lobato vs D. Pamminger Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.94% (332/241) | YTD Win/Loss | 42.65% (29/39) |
| 57.77% (740/541) | Sets Win/Loss | 45.21% (66/80) |
| 53.87% (6216/5323) | Games Win/Loss | 49.46% (643/657) |
| 40.54% (15/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 41.67% (5/7) |
| 59.06% (313/217) | Clay Win/Loss | 42.86% (24/32) |
| 66.67% (4/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 724 | Aces Total | 11 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.03 |
| 655 | Total Double Faults | 17 |
| 1:2:33 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 568.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 409.57 |
| 68% (15519/22976) | 1st Serve % | 66% (272/415) |
| 65% (10093/15519) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (165/272) |
| 50% (3739/7457) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (59/143) |
| 48% (1380/2904) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 58% (15/26) |
| 44% (10492/23580) | Return Points Win % | 39% (146/373) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.79% (32/31) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59.17% (300/207) | Futures W/L | 42.65% (29/39) |
| 61% (326/533) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 42% (27/64) |
| 10% (1/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (59/125) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (4/12) |
| 54% (85/156) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (6/14) |
| 86% (339/292) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (31/27) |
| 13% (339/44) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (31/4) |
| 18% (234/41) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (36/3) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
11:00 PM 15/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction07:30 AM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 16/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Simona Waltert Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Auger-Aliassime Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
22:30
H2H 4-3
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico