Edison Ambarzumjan vs Rafael Ymer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Ambarzumjan vs R. Ymer

Edison Ambarzumjan
GER
w
w
l
l
l
w
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
29
Age
19
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Rafael Ymer
SWE
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
29
Age
19
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Ambarzumjan 1 - 0 Ymer
They have played 2 sets in total, with Edison Ambarzumjan winning 2 and Rafael Ymer winning 0. The last match between Edison Ambarzumjan and Rafael Ymer was at the M15 Addis Ababa, 16-05-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Edison Ambarzumjan getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ambarzumjan | 1 |
| Ymer | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Addis Ababa(05-16-24)
Edison Ambarzumjan
6
6
Rafael Ymer
4
4
E. Ambarzumjan vs R. Ymer H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 48.63% (71-75) | Career Total W/L | 33.33% (10-20) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. Ambarzumjan vs R. Ymer Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Edison Ambarzumjan has won 45.42% of points on their second serve, while Rafael Ymer has won 31.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Edison Ambarzumjan, in recent form, has won 43.09% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rafael Ymer has won 57.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.34% and 40.00% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Edison Ambarzumjan has saved 60.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rafael Ymer has saved 41.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Edison Ambarzumjan has won 46.15% of matches played (W/L 18/21), with Rafael Ymer winning 50.00% (W/L 5/5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Edison Ambarzumjan has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 2/1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 9/12). Rafael Ymer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 1/1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 32% (W/L 7/15).
- Player level: In the last year, Edison Ambarzumjan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.37% of matches (W/L 18/20), where as Rafael Ymer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 5/5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Edison Ambarzumjan winning 1 times and Rafael Ymer being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Edison Ambarzumjan winning 2 and Rafael Ymer winning 0.
- The last match between Edison Ambarzumjan and Rafael Ymer was at the M15 Addis Ababa, 16-05-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Edison Ambarzumjan getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Edison Ambarzumjan has played against opponents with an average rank of 180.67 while Rafael Ymer has played against players with an average rank of 63.3.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Edison Ambarzumjan has won 27% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rafael Ymer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Edison Ambarzumjan has converted 40.00% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rafael Ymer has converted 57.14% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Edison Ambarzumjan vs Rafael Ymer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Ambarzumjan vs R. Ymer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:33:0 | Average Match Time | 1:33:0 |
| 46% (24/52) | 1st Serve % | 62% (38/61) |
| 83% (20/24) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (25/38) |
| 54% (15/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (10/23) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (2/2) |
| 43% (26/61) | Return Points Win % | 33% (17/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Ambarzumjan 49%, Ymer 45%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Ambarzumjan 49%, Ymer 57%.
Break Points Saved %: Ambarzumjan 59%, Ymer 53%.
E. Ambarzumjan Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 2-0 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 6-3 | ||
R. Ymer Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 7-5 | ||
Q2 | L | 6-0 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||

E. Ambarzumjan vs R. Ymer Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48.63% (71/75) | YTD Win/Loss | 33.33% (10/20) |
| 50.00% (164/164) | Sets Win/Loss | 34.85% (23/43) |
| 49.71% (1621/1640) | Games Win/Loss | 43.32% (269/352) |
| 50.00% (19/19) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 50.65% (39/38) | Clay Win/Loss | 31.82% (7/15) |
| 39.29% (11/17) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 183 | Aces Total | 8 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 181 | Total Double Faults | 72 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 210.28 | Average Opponent Rank | 163.07 |
| 59% (3062/5202) | 1st Serve % | 60% (655/1092) |
| 64% (1962/3062) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (366/655) |
| 48% (1026/2140) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (193/437) |
| 40% (174/430) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (40/94) |
| 38% (1948/5090) | Return Points Win % | 39% (399/1034) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 48.95% (70/73) | Futures W/L | 35.71% (10/18) |
| 49% (71/146) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (10/30) |
| 58% (21/36) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 80% (4/5) |
| 39% (14/36) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (3/6) |
| 85% (74/63) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (8/7) |
| 15% (74/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (8/1) |
| 11% (72/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (22/3) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Mon, 24 Nov, 01:00 PM
PredictionMon, 24 Nov, 01:00 PM
PredictionMon, 24 Nov, 02:30 PM
PredictionMon, 24 Nov, 08:00 AM
PredictionMon, 24 Nov, 01:00 PM
PredictionMon, 24 Nov, 02:30 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

23 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Matteo Berrettini vs Pablo Carreno-Busta Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, F, ITA – 23rd November 2025 Best Bets

23 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Jaume Antoni Munar Clar Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, F, ITA – 23rd November 2025 Best Bets

22 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Leolia Jeanjean vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Talia Gibson Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
16:00
H2H 0-1
02:35
H2H 0-0
05:30
H2H 0-0
07:00
H2H 0-0
11:30
H2H 0-0