Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Eden Silva vs Lucie Nguyen Tan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Silva vs Tan analysis and find out who is favored!
Eden Silva vs Lucie Nguyen Tan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Silva has won 47.54% of points on his second serve, while Tan has won 43.81%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Silva, in recent form, has won 52.98% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tan has won 56.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.4% and 41.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Silva has saved 60.68% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tan has saved 53.72% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Silva has won 46.34% of matches played (W/L 19/ 22), with Tan winning 54.29% (W/L 38/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Silva has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 120/ 97), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 30% (W/L 13/ 31). Tan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 83/ 73), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 27% (W/L 7/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Silva has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.65% of matches (W/L 18/ 19), where as Tan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.94% of matches (W/L 27/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Silva winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Silva winning 4 and Tan winning 1. The last match between Silva and Tan was at the W25 Loughborough, 25-10-2022, First, I.hard with Eden Silva getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Silva and Tan have played a deciding set 1 times, with Silva winning 1 times and Tan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Silva winning 0, and Tan 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Silva has played against opponents with an average rank of 264.12 while Tan has played against players with an average rank of 201.09.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Silva has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tan has won 68% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Silva has converted 46.07% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tan has converted 44.81% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Silva 2 - 0 Tan
434
Rank
298
High
28
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
2
Indoor0
0
Grass0
525
Rank
366
High
20
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
51% (233-223)
Career Total W/L
49% (107-111)
29% (2-5)
YTD W/L
57% (13-10)
$34,855
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Eden Silva | Lucie Nguyen Tan |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 33 | 21 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:30 | 1:33:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (72/125) | 53% (78/146) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (52/72) | 59% (46/78) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (27/53) | 44% (30/68) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 64% (9/14) | 44% (4/9) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (70/146) | 37% (46/125) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Eden Silva
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| 4-6 7-5 10-7 |
Stats
Eden Silva
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
8
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Eden Silva | Lucie Nguyen Tan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 29% (2/5) | 57% (13/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (7/9) | 53% (27/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (67/75) | 50% (223/224) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (11/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 29% (2/5) | 50% (2/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 14 | 19 |
| DFs per game | 0.1 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 7 | 62 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:51 | 1:30:2 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 441.14 | 149.17 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (338/500) | 65% (927/1420) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (206/338) | 57% (526/927) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (72/162) | 42% (206/493) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (22/50) | 45% (89/196) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (180/446) | 48% (644/1347) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 29% (2/5) | 55% (6/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (7/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (2/6) | 57% (13/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 80% (4/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 100% (9/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (9/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 29% (14/4) |
Eden Silva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Carmen Corley
Player
Eden Silva
71%
(
10 of
14)
1st Serve %
70%
(
14 of
20)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
7 of
10)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
11 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
16
Total Points Won
18
|
2-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Silvia Ambrosio
Player
Eden Silva
73%
(
83 of
114)
1st Serve %
71%
(
80 of
113)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
46 of
80)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
43%
(
49 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
111
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eden Silva
Player
Noka Juric
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikola Bartunkova
Player
Eden Silva
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eden Silva
Player
Sarah Beth Grey
81%
(
81 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
84)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Maklakova
Player
Eden Silva
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Freya Christie
Player
Eden Silva
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
90)
10
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Eden Silva
52%
(
55 of
106)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
103)
12
Aces
6
10
Double Faults
4
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
37%
(
19 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
43 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
103)
107
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eden Silva
Player
Martyna Ostrzygalo
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kylie Mckenzie
Player
Eden Silva
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Lucie Nguyen Tan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucie Nguyen Tan
Player
Wozuko Mdlulwa
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
22 of
36)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
60
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Diana Marcinkevica
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucie Nguyen Tan
Player
Jade Psonka
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marie Vogt
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucie Nguyen Tan
Player
Jana Vanik
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve %
70%
(
26 of
37)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mila Masic
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucie Nguyen Tan
Player
Marie Vogt
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucie Nguyen Tan
Player
Stefanie Auer
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ksenia Zaytseva
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Silva Vs Tan Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
