Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Edan Leshem vs Christopher Heyman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Leshem vs Heyman analysis and find out who is favored!
Edan Leshem vs Christopher Heyman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Leshem has won 38.27% of points on his second serve, while Heyman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Leshem, in recent form, has won 55.56% of his opponent's second serve points, while Heyman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.78% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Leshem has saved 46.88% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Heyman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Leshem has won 47.37% of matches played (W/L 9/ 10), with Heyman winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Leshem has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 265/ 162), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8). Heyman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 113/ 58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 42/ 31).
- Player level: In the last year, Leshem has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 6/ 4), where as Heyman has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Leshem winning 1 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Leshem winning 3 and Heyman winning 4. The last match between Leshem and Heyman was at the M25 Vale do Lobo, 25-02-2022, Quarterfinals, Hard with Christopher Heyman getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:50:46.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Leshem and Heyman have played a deciding set 1 times, with Leshem winning 0 times and Heyman 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Leshem winning 0, and Heyman 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Leshem has played against opponents with an average rank of 191.68 while Heyman has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Leshem has won 20% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Heyman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Leshem has converted 48.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Heyman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Leshem 1 - 2 Heyman
865
Rank
249
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total2
1
Hard2
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
812
Rank
258
High
30
Age
L
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
58% (308-220)
Career Total W/L
64% (352-201)
25% (1-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$26,870
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Edan Leshem | Christopher Heyman |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 4 |
| Games Won | 29 | 33 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:46 | 1:50:46 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (129/208) | 67% (148/221) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (85/129) | 66% (97/148) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 41% (32/79) | 45% (33/73) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (8/28) | 53% (10/19) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (91/221) | 44% (91/208) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-6 6-2 6-0 |
Stats 
Christopher Heyman
Player
Edan Leshem
80%
(
61 of
76)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Christopher Heyman
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 6-3 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Edan Leshem
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Edan Leshem | Christopher Heyman |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 25% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (33/40) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 10 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:23 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 119 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (159/240) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (93/159) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 38% (31/81) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (14/29) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (93/219) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Edan Leshem Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Drew Van Orderlain
Player
Edan Leshem
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Edan Leshem
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Edan Leshem
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Gonzalo Lama
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
38%
(
17 of
45)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yshai Oliel
Player
Edan Leshem
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
52
Total Points Won
50
|
5-7 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Jordan Hasson
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Emile Hudd
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Martyn Pawelski
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
1
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Edan Leshem
46%
(
30 of
65)
1st Serve %
41%
(
22 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Ofek Shimanov
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
50%
(
53 of
105)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Christopher Heyman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Christopher Heyman
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
11
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
77%
(
23 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
13 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Christopher Heyman
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Adrien Gobat
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sidane Pontjodikromo
Player
Christopher Heyman
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
59 of
77)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Philip Sekulic
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve %
69%
(
9 of
13)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
18
Total Points Won
13
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Christopher Heyman
74%
(
84 of
114)
1st Serve %
70%
(
77 of
110)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
46%
(
52 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
110)
115
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Olivier Rojas
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Jip Van Assendelft
82%
(
70 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
23 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(6) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Christopher Heyman
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Christopher Heyman
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Leshem Vs Heyman Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
