Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Dusan Obradovic vs Quentin Folliot Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Obradovic vs Folliot analysis and find out who is favored!
Dusan Obradovic vs Quentin Folliot Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Obradovic has won 53.56% of points on his second serve, while Folliot has won 52.4%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Obradovic, in recent form, has won 48.36% of his opponent's second serve points, while Folliot has won 48.31%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.11% and 33.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Obradovic has saved 62.73% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Folliot has saved 45.12% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Obradovic has won 58.49% of matches played (W/L 31/ 22), with Folliot winning 52.94% (W/L 18/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Obradovic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 89/ 70), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 22% (W/L 4/ 14). Folliot has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 139/ 99), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Obradovic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.49% of matches (W/L 31/ 22), where as Folliot has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.94% of matches (W/L 18/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Obradovic winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Obradovic winning 2 and Folliot winning 0. The last match between Obradovic and Folliot was at the M15 Belgrade, 30-06-2022, Second, Clay with Dusan Obradovic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:58:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Obradovic and Folliot have played a deciding set 0 times, with Obradovic winning 0 times and Folliot 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Obradovic winning 1, and Folliot 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Obradovic has played against opponents with an average rank of 134.79 while Folliot has played against players with an average rank of 209.62.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Obradovic has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Folliot has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Obradovic has converted 35.34% of breakpoint opportunities, and Folliot has converted 41.23% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Obradovic 1 - 0 Folliot
679
Rank
666
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
844
Rank
488
High
25
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
52% (95-87)
Career Total W/L
56% (200-156)
50% (6-6)
YTD W/L
67% (12-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Dusan Obradovic | Quentin Folliot |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:58:0 | 1:58:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (48/78) | 63% (46/73) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (28/48) | 63% (29/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (12/30) | 30% (8/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 38% (5/13) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (36/73) | 49% (38/78) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(7) 6-4 |
Stats 
Dusan Obradovic
Player
Quentin Folliot
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
49%
(
38 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Dusan Obradovic | Quentin Folliot |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (6/6) | 67% (12/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (16/14) | 62% (26/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (153/144) | 52% (194/181) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 71% (12/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 30 | 44 |
| DFs per game | 0.09 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 13 | 27 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:30 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 136.67 | 224.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (594/897) | 59% (625/1062) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (383/594) | 66% (411/625) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (167/303) | 52% (229/437) |
| BPs Won% Total | 36% (41/115) | 41% (47/114) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (390/945) | 39% (439/1124) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (6/6) | 67% (12/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (6/12) | 65% (11/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 57% (7/4) | 91% (11/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 43% (7/3) | 9% (11/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 40% (5/2) | 14% (7/1) |
Dusan Obradovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Marino Jakic
Player
Dusan Obradovic
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dusan Obradovic
Player
Jan Kupcic
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alec Deckers
Player
Dusan Obradovic
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
77%
(
69 of
90)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
50 of
69)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
28 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
90)
88
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dusan Obradovic
Player
Simon Beaupain
70%
(
65 of
93)
1st Serve %
79%
(
72 of
91)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dusan Obradovic
Player
Gregor Ramskogler
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
75%
(
65 of
87)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zoran Ludoski
Player
Dusan Obradovic
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
70)
1
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dusan Obradovic
Player
Sergej Zivkovic
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Dusan Obradovic
53%
(
49 of
93)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
81)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
36%
(
16 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
40 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dusan Obradovic
Player
Zoran Ludoski
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sandro Kopp
Player
Dusan Obradovic
74%
(
59 of
80)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Quentin Folliot Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Mateus Alves
Player
Quentin Folliot
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
53
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Quentin Folliot
Player
Jose Pereira
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Quentin Folliot
Player
Gustavo Ribeiro De Almeida
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
61)
57
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Folliot
Player
Enzo Crevelaro
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joaquim Almeida
Player
Quentin Folliot
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
90
Total Points Won
67
|
6-0 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Quentin Folliot
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
6
Aces
5
-
Double Faults
-
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Folliot
Player
Gabriel Tumasonis
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
61 of
100)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
100
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Andrea Picchione
Player
Quentin Folliot
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
13 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
49
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Quentin Folliot
Player
Alessandro Pecci
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
72%
(
50 of
69)
0
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
1
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
69)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Quentin Folliot
Player
Kenny de Schepper
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
79%
(
52 of
66)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Obradovic Vs Folliot Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
