Dragos Nicolae Madaras vs Jonas Merckx Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Madaras vs Merckx analysis and find out who is favored!
Dragos Nicolae Madaras vs Jonas Merckx Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Madaras has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Merckx has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Madaras, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Merckx has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Madaras has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Merckx has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Madaras has won 75.56% of matches played (W/L 34/ 11), with Merckx winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Madaras has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 295/ 139), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Merckx has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 100/ 60), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 7/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Madaras has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 93.33% of matches (W/L 28/ 2), where as Merckx has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Madaras has played against opponents with an average rank of 245.42 while Merckx has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Madaras has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Merckx has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Madaras has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Merckx has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Madaras 0 - 0 Merckx
19
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
19
Minor
326
Rank
191
High
26
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
443
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
66% (324-165)
Career Total W/L
58% (207-148)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$42,460
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
w/o |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Dragos Nicolae Madaras | Jonas Merckx |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Dragos Nicolae Madaras Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Marko Topo
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
Marco Cecchinato
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
78%
(
38 of
49)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
Remy Bertola
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
39%
(
19 of
49)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Luca Van Assche
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cristian Garin
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
8
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
6 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
F |
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
Sebastian Gima
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
David Poljak
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
100%
(
24 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Jonas Merckx Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
R2 |
Jonas Merckx
Player
Pedro Vives Marcos
56%
(
56 of
100)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
0
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
3
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jonas Merckx
Player
Martim Leote Prata
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Niels Desein
Player
Jonas Merckx
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
8
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jonas Merckx
Player
Maxime Tchoutakian
49%
(
37 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
2
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Colin Sinclair
Player
Jonas Merckx
50%
(
51 of
102)
1st Serve %
44%
(
32 of
73)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
11
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
51%
(
26 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
98
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jonas Merckx
Player
Simon Carr
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
112)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
70)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
51 of
112)
113
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jonas Merckx
Player
Buvaysar Gadamauri
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Juan Bautista Otegui
Player
Jonas Merckx
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jonas Merckx
Player
Nico Mertens
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more