Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Dominic Thiem vs Jurgen Melzer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Thiem vs Melzer analysis and find out who is favored!
Dominic Thiem vs Jurgen Melzer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Thiem has won 48.56% of points on his second serve, while Melzer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Thiem, in recent form, has won 45.54% of his opponent's second serve points, while Melzer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.25% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Thiem has saved 57.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Melzer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Thiem has won 50.98% of matches played (W/L 26/ 25), with Melzer winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Thiem has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 258/ 110), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 14/ 17). Melzer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 118/ 73), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 134/ 128).
- Player level: In the last year, Thiem has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 54.17% of matches (W/L 13/ 11), where as Melzer has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Thiem winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Thiem winning 2 and Melzer winning 2. The last match between Thiem and Melzer was at the Generali Open - Kitzbuhel, 20-07-2016, Second, Clay with Jurgen Melzer getting the victory 1100037953.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:46.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Thiem and Melzer have played a deciding set 0 times, with Thiem winning 0 times and Melzer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Thiem winning 0, and Melzer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Thiem has played against opponents with an average rank of 166.22 while Melzer has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Thiem has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Melzer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Thiem has converted 31.18% of breakpoint opportunities, and Melzer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Thiem 1 - 1 Melzer
110
Rank
3
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
8
High
42
Age
L
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
64% (482-272)
Career Total W/L
54% (504-424)
43% (6-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$20,491,215
Career Prize Money
$4,041,290
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Dominic Thiem | Jurgen Melzer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 21 | 21 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:46 | 1:16:46 |
| 1st Serve % | 48% (54/112) | 74% (94/127) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (41/54) | 67% (63/94) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 66% (38/58) | 58% (19/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (45/127) | 29% (33/112) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Jurgen Melzer
Player
Dominic Thiem
77%
(
57 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
16 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats
Dominic Thiem
Player
Jurgen Melzer
43%
(
26 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Dominic Thiem | Jurgen Melzer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 43% (6/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 40% (14/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (156/188) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.31 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 52 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 39 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:17 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 194.86 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (599/959) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (400/599) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (171/360) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 31% (24/78) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (339/977) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 46% (6/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Dominic Thiem Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Dominic Thiem
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dominic Thiem
Player
Felipe Meligeni Alves
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
73%
(
72 of
99)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
6-2 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Dominic Thiem
75%
(
58 of
77)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Dominic Thiem
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Dominic Thiem
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominic Thiem
Player
Maximilian Marterer
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
82
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lukas Neumayer
Player
Dominic Thiem
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Dominic Thiem
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Jurgen Melzer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 7-6(7) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bjorn Fratangelo
Player
Jurgen Melzer
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
8
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Steven Diez
Player
Jurgen Melzer
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Jurgen Melzer
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pablo Andujar
Player
Jurgen Melzer
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
39%
(
23 of
59)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jurgen Melzer
Player
Sergio Gutierrez-Ferrol
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Thiem Vs Melzer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
