Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Dino Prizmic vs Savriyan Danilov Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Prizmic vs Danilov analysis and find out who is favored!
Dino Prizmic vs Savriyan Danilov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Prizmic has won 51.25% of points on his second serve, while Danilov has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Prizmic, in recent form, has won 52.83% of his opponent's second serve points, while Danilov has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.93% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Prizmic has saved 58.42% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Danilov has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Prizmic has won 53.49% of matches played (W/L 23/ 20), with Danilov winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Prizmic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 87% (W/L 27/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 14/ 12). Danilov has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 33/ 23), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 37% (W/L 17/ 29).
- Player level: In the last year, Prizmic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.57% of matches (W/L 15/ 13), where as Danilov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 1/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Prizmic winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Prizmic winning 2 and Danilov winning 0. The last match between Prizmic and Danilov was at the M15 Dubrovnik, 08-04-2022, Quarterfinals, Clay with Dino Prizmic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:5:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Prizmic and Danilov have played a deciding set 0 times, with Prizmic winning 0 times and Danilov 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Prizmic winning 0, and Danilov 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Prizmic has played against opponents with an average rank of 249.37 while Danilov has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Prizmic has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Danilov has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Prizmic has converted 39.34% of breakpoint opportunities, and Danilov has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Prizmic 1 - 0 Danilov
185
Rank
155
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
873
Rank
556
High
23
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
66% (73-38)
Career Total W/L
50% (93-94)
54% (7-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$137,860
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Dino Prizmic | Savriyan Danilov |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 1 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:5:0 | 1:5:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (31/42) | 76% (34/45) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (24/31) | 35% (12/34) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 64% (7/11) | 36% (4/11) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 64% (29/45) | 26% (11/42) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-1 |
Stats 
Dino Prizmic
Player
Savriyan Danilov
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
27
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Dino Prizmic | Savriyan Danilov |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (18/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (170/156) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.35 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 56 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 36 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:15:48 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 268.08 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (642/1003) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (432/642) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (185/361) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (48/122) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (465/1114) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (7/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Dino Prizmic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jonas Forejtek
Player
Dino Prizmic
64%
(
74 of
116)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
50%
(
37 of
74)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
58 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(8) 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Michael Vrbensky
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Dino Prizmic
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Leandro Riedi
Player
Dino Prizmic
71%
(
69 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Antoine Escoffier
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Lloyd Harris
66%
(
63 of
96)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
3
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
38 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Goffin
Player
Dino Prizmic
58%
(
67 of
115)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
42%
(
20 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
49 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 6-7(12) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Dino Prizmic
60%
(
77 of
129)
1st Serve %
68%
(
84 of
123)
11
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
55 of
84)
62%
(
32 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
12 of
39)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
46 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
56 of
123)
139
Total Points Won
113
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Aziz Dougaz
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
5
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
4
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Savriyan Danilov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tomohiro Masabayashi
Player
Savriyan Danilov
50%
(
13 of
26)
1st Serve %
54%
(
14 of
26)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
8 of
13)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
9 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
29
Total Points Won
23
|
5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yurii Dzhavakian
Player
Savriyan Danilov
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Savriyan Danilov
Player
Claudio Renardi Lumanau
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominik Palan
Player
Savriyan Danilov
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
79
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(8) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Makoto Ochi
Player
Savriyan Danilov
74%
(
63 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Asahi Harazaki
Player
Savriyan Danilov
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aldin Setkic
Player
Savriyan Danilov
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Savriyan Danilov
55%
(
65 of
118)
1st Serve %
64%
(
68 of
106)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
51%
(
27 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
42%
(
50 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
115
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Savriyan Danilov
Player
Leonardo Catani
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
1
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
36 of
46)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleksandr Ovcharenko
Player
Savriyan Danilov
67%
(
72 of
108)
1st Serve %
62%
(
67 of
108)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
44%
(
48 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
108
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Prizmic Vs Danilov Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
