Dino Prizmic vs Kimmer Coppejans Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Prizmic vs K. Coppejans

Dino Prizmic
CRO
w
l
w
w
w
l
l
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
20
Age
31
-
Height
5'11" (180 cm)
120
C. Rank
179
115
Best Rank
97
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$308.7K
Career Money
$337.8K
-
Plays
Right-Handed

Kimmer Coppejans
BEL
w
l
w
l
l
w
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
20
Age
31
-
Height
5'11" (180 cm)
120
C. Rank
179
115
Best Rank
97
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$308.7K
Career Money
$337.8K
-
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Prizmic 1 - 0 Coppejans
They have played 2 sets in total, with Dino Prizmic winning 2 and Kimmer Coppejans winning 0. The last match between Dino Prizmic and Kimmer Coppejans was at the Banja Luka Challenger, 13-08-2023, Round: F, Surface: Clay, with Dino Prizmic getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Prizmic | 1 |
Coppejans | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(F) Banja Luka Challenger(08-13-23)
Dino Prizmic
6
6
Kimmer Coppejans
2
3
D. Prizmic vs K. Coppejans H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$308,745 | Career Prize Money | $337,830 |
65.97% (126-65) | Career Total W/L | 58.61% (490-346) |
1 | Clay | 0 |
8 | Titles | 17 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
50.00% (4-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. Prizmic vs K. Coppejans Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Dino Prizmic has won 44.28% of points on their second serve, while Kimmer Coppejans has won 44.54%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Dino Prizmic, in recent form, has won 45.49% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kimmer Coppejans has won 48.29%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.02% and 31.27% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Dino Prizmic has saved 48.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kimmer Coppejans has saved 54.52% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Dino Prizmic has won 70.97% of matches played (W/L 44/18), with Kimmer Coppejans winning 67.44% (W/L 58/28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Dino Prizmic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 78% (W/L 36/10), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/1). Kimmer Coppejans has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 78% (W/L 146/90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 3/9).
- Player level: In the last year, Dino Prizmic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 74.00% of matches (W/L 37/13), where as Kimmer Coppejans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.65% of matches (W/L 34/23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Dino Prizmic winning 1 times and Kimmer Coppejans being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Dino Prizmic winning 2 and Kimmer Coppejans winning 0.
- The last match between Dino Prizmic and Kimmer Coppejans was at the Banja Luka Challenger, 13-08-2023, Round: F, Surface: Clay, with Dino Prizmic getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:51:18.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Dino Prizmic has played against opponents with an average rank of 235.94 while Kimmer Coppejans has played against players with an average rank of 208.63.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Dino Prizmic has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kimmer Coppejans has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Dino Prizmic has converted 33.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kimmer Coppejans has converted 35.36% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Dino Prizmic vs Kimmer Coppejans Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Prizmic vs K. Coppejans H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 5 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
1:51:18 | Average Match Time | 1:51:18 |
61% (41/67) | 1st Serve % | 54% (29/54) |
56% (23/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (15/29) |
46% (12/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 16% (4/25) |
47% (7/15) | Break Pts Won % | 36% (4/11) |
65% (35/54) | Return Points Win % | 48% (32/67) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Prizmic 52%, Coppejans 51%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Prizmic 54%, Coppejans 54%.
Break Points Saved %: Prizmic 62%, Coppejans 59%.
D. Prizmic Recent Matches Played
K. Coppejans Recent Matches Played

D. Prizmic vs K. Coppejans Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
65.97% (126/65) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.61% (490/346) |
62.56% (269/161) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.82% (1113/881) |
55.78% (2171/1721) | Games Win/Loss | 52.59% (9833/8865) |
78.26% (36/10) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.86% (146/90) |
64.84% (59/32) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.60% (323/210) |
57.69% (30/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 32.73% (18/37) |
50.00% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 25.00% (3/9) |
0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
586 | Aces Total | 2274 |
0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
506 | Total Double Faults | 1929 |
1:48:4 | Average Match Time | 1:30:4 |
361.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 218.28 |
60% (7429/12324) | 1st Serve % | 64% (32995/51380) |
68% (5067/7429) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (22134/32995) |
52% (2528/4895) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (8939/18385) |
46% (662/1448) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (2488/5721) |
43% (5365/12340) | Return Points Win % | 42% (22025/52524) |
58.33% (7/5) | Slam W/L | 52.86% (37/33) |
0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
25.00% (1/3) | Cups W/L | 33.33% (3/6) |
52.63% (10/9) | Main Tour W/L | 27.50% (11/29) |
65.49% (74/39) | Challenger W/L | 56.69% (305/233) |
79.07% (34/9) | Futures W/L | 75.28% (134/44) |
66% (121/183) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (482/821) |
33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 45% (5/11) |
35% (11/31) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (125/226) |
59% (29/49) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (178/312) |
92% (122/112) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (455/381) |
7% (122/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (455/73) |
20% (69/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (381/108) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
02:30 PM 21/10/25
PredictionW1
2.81
W2
1.43
05:00 PM 20/10/25
PredictionW1
2.2
W2
1.67
02:00 PM 21/10/25
PredictionW1
1.65
W2
2.23
01:00 PM 20/10/25
PredictionW1
1.69
W2
2.08
02:00 PM 21/10/25
PredictionW1
2.42
W2
1.56
03:00 PM 20/10/25
PredictionW1
2.58
W2
1.46
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
20 Oct 2025
Katie Boulter vs Eva Lys Prediction – WTA Toray Pan Pacific Open – 20th October 2025 Best Bets
20 Oct 2025
Xinyu Wang vs Varvara Gracheva Prediction – WTA Toray Pan Pacific Open – 20th October 2025 Best Bets
19 Oct 2025
Toray Pan Pacific Open – Tokyo Preview And Prediction: Marketa Vondrousova vs Karolina Muchova Betting Tips & Picks October 20, 2025
19 Oct 2025
Toray Pan Pacific Open – Tokyo Preview And Prediction: Diana Shnaider vs Dayana Yastremska Betting Tips & Picks October 21, 2025
19 Oct 2025
Simona Waltert vs Alice Rame Prediction – WTA Rio Ladies Open – 19th October 2025 Best Bets
19 Oct 2025
Renata Zarazua vs Anna Sinclair Rogers Prediction – WTA W100 Macon – 19th October 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
H2H 5-4
14:00
H2H 5-2
14:00
H2H 2-3
13:00
H2H 3-1
04:30
H2H 1-3
Tennis Events This Week
Erste Bank Open - Vienna
Austria
Swiss Indoors Basel - Basel
Switzerland
Brest Challenger
France
Costa do Sauipe Challenger
Brazil
Hamburg Challenger
Germany
Sioux Falls Challenger
United States
Suzhou Challenger
China
M15 Castellon
Spain
M15 Hua Hin
Thailand
M25 Huzhou
China
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula
Italy
M25 Sarreguemines
France
M25 Sheffield
Great Britain