Dillon Beckles vs Corentin Denolly Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Oct at 07:38 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Beckles vs C. Denolly

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win

FRA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Beckles 0 - 1 Denolly
They have played 2 sets in total, with Dillon Beckles winning 0 and Corentin Denolly winning 2. The last match between Corentin Denolly and Dillon Beckles was at the M25 Kigali, 16-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Corentin Denolly getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Beckles | 0 |
| Denolly | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Kigali(10-16-25)
D. Beckles vs C. Denolly H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $56,935 |
| 41.38% (12-17) | Career Total W/L | 62.37% (431-260) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 0 | Titles | 13 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (1-1) |
D. Beckles vs C. Denolly Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Corentin Denolly leads this aspect by winning 42.03% of points on their second serve compared to Dillon Beckles' 34.92%. Could this be the deciding factor in the match outcome?
- Return Game Capability: Denolly has a slight edge, capturing 50.20% of opponent's second serve points, slightly above Beckles' 48.89%. In first serve returns, Denolly also shows a stronger performance with 30.00% compared to Beckles' 23.81%.
- Handling Breakpoints: Beckles is marginally better at saving breakpoints under pressure, with a saving rate of 54.84%, in contrast to Denolly's 50.33%.
- Overall Performance: In the last year, Corentin Denolly notches a better match win percentage at 50.88%, outperforming Dillon Beckles who has won only 38.46% of his matches.
- Surface Preference: Beckles excels on indoor hard courts with a 50% win rate, while Denolly favors clay with a similar win rate. Could surface preferences influence the match outcome?
- Competition Level: Beckles has been active in lower-tier tournaments, winning 37.50% of matches, whereas Denolly competes at a higher level, winning 38.24% of matches in Challengers and ITF events.
- Strength of Opponents: Beckles faced stronger adversaries with an average rank of 140.27, while Denolly's opponents averaged a rank of 333.21. How might this rival quality factor affect today's match?
- Deciding Set Performance: This could clinch the prediction. Denolly shows strong performance in clutch situations, winning 61% of deciding sets compared to Beckles who hasn't won any.
Editorial Prediction (October 16, 2025, UTC):
Corentin Denolly appears stronger on several critical metrics, which could heavily impact the outcome of the match. His superior second serve performance, coupled with better overall match and surface performance statistics, suggests a higher likelihood of success.
Dillon Beckles, while performing admirably in certain areas such as breakpoint saves and facing strong opponents, may not have the consistency required to win.
Considering the overall balance of performance measures and recent trends, Corentin Denolly demonstrates the attributes necessary to emerge victorious in the upcoming match.
Dillon Beckles vs Corentin Denolly Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Beckles vs C. Denolly H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 1 | Games Won | 12 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:56:48 | Average Match Time | 0:56:48 |
| 55% (23/42) | 1st Serve % | 66% (23/35) |
| 30% (7/23) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (16/23) |
| 42% (8/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 75% (9/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Pts Won % | 75% (6/8) |
| 29% (10/35) | Return Points Win % | 64% (27/42) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. Beckles Recent Matches Played
C. Denolly Recent Matches Played

D. Beckles vs C. Denolly Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 41.38% (12/17) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.37% (431/260) |
| 42.62% (26/35) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.81% (942/633) |
| 47.17% (258/289) | Games Win/Loss | 53.85% (7898/6769) |
| 37.50% (6/10) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.96% (61/48) |
| 45.45% (5/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.55% (312/164) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.24% (58/47) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 13 | Aces Total | 2070 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 35 | Total Double Faults | 2019 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:27:21 |
| 136.14 | Average Opponent Rank | 507.76 |
| 64% (388/607) | 1st Serve % | 65% (27874/42860) |
| 58% (226/388) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (18732/27874) |
| 46% (100/219) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (7290/14987) |
| 53% (33/62) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (2204/4870) |
| 44% (263/593) | Return Points Win % | 43% (18564/43512) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Challenger W/L | 43.08% (56/74) |
| 40.74% (11/16) | Futures W/L | 67.15% (370/181) |
| 41% (12/29) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (427/681) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 33% (2/6) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (106/189) |
| 33% (1/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (118/201) |
| 100% (11/11) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (416/375) |
| 0% (11/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (416/41) |
| 6% (18/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (275/56) |