Denis Yevseyev vs Philip Henning Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
D. Yevseyev vs P. Henning

Denis Yevseyev

KAZ

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'1" (185 cm)

Height

404

C. Rank

360

153

Best Rank

324

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$107.5K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Philip Henning

RSA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'1" (185 cm)

Height

404

C. Rank

360

153

Best Rank

324

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$107.5K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Yevseyev 1 - 0 Henning

They have played 2 sets in total, with Denis Yevseyev winning 2 and Philip Henning winning 0. The last match between Denis Yevseyev and Philip Henning was at the Glasgow Challenger, 20-02-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Denis Yevseyev getting the victory 6-2 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Yevseyev	1
Henning	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) Glasgow Challenger(02-20-25)

Stats

Denis Yevseyev

Philip Henning

D. Yevseyev vs P. Henning H2H Profile

D. Yevseyev	Stats	P. Henning
$107,480	Career Prize Money	$0
53.37% (483-422)	Career Total W/L	76.19% (128-40)
1	Indoor	0
9	Titles	13
1	Total H2H Matches	0
100.00% (1-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

D. Yevseyev vs P. Henning Match Preview:

Analyzed Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, there has been a noticeable discrepancy in the second serve performance of Yevseyev and Henning. Yevseyev has achieved a 49.62% success rate in winning points on their second serve, whereas Henning has displayed a higher proficiency, winning 57.99% of such points. It is worth noting that there exists a strong correlation between this particular statistical indicator and the accuracy of match predictions.
Recent Return Game Statistics: Examining the return game stats of Yevseyev and Henning in their most recent performances, it is evident that Yevseyev has been successful in winning 51.2% of their opponent's points on the second serve. Conversely, Henning has displayed a marginally better return game, with a success rate of 59.67% on the opponent's second serve. For the first serve returns, Yevseyev holds a success rate of 32.28%, while Henning has demonstrated a higher level of efficacy, with a success rate of 37.14%. These statistics hold immense significance when attempting to determine the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.
Under Pressure Analysis: In terms of their ability to handle pressure situations, Yevseyev has proven capable of saving breakpoints, achieving a 57.03% success rate in recent performances. Similarly, Henning has exhibited an impressive ability to save breakpoints, with a success rate of 59.05%. This statistic holds relevance for those engaged in in-game betting predictions.
Performance Overview: Evaluating the performance of both Yevseyev and Henning over the course of the past year, Yevseyev has emerged victorious in 44.29% of the matches played, with a win-loss record of 31 wins and 39 losses. In stark contrast, Henning has enjoyed a significantly higher success rate, winning 77.78% of their matches, with a remarkable win-loss record of 56 wins and 16 losses. This comprehensive overview provides valuable insights into predicting the outcome of their upcoming match.
Surface Specializations: When analyzing each player's career win percentages on different surfaces, it is evident that Yevseyev excels on hard courts, securing victory in 55% of their matches (220 wins and 178 losses). Conversely, Yevseyev's performance on grass courts is comparatively weaker, with a win rate of only 50% (2 wins and 2 losses). On the other hand, Henning's strongest surface is hard court, where they have triumphed in 81% of their matches (70 wins and 16 losses). However, Henning encounters difficulties on clay courts, achieving a win rate of 63% (12 wins and 7 losses).
Player Level: Over the past year, Yevseyev has primarily competed in the challengers and ITF tournaments, each offering prize money exceeding $10,000. During this period, Yevseyev has secured victory in 42.22% of their matches (19 wins and 26 losses). In stark contrast, Henning has predominantly participated in the futures, satellites, and ITF tournaments with a prize money value of $10,000. Remarkably, Henning has emerged triumphant in an impressive 86.44% of their matches (51 wins and 8 losses). Therefore, when assessing the statistical comparisons between the two players to predict the favored competitor, it is integral to consider the level of the events they participated in.
Opponent Quality Statistics: Within the last twelve months, Yevseyev has encountered opponents with an average ranking of 260.13. Conversely, Henning has faced players with an average ranking of 424.74. These opponent quality statistics provide essential context when evaluating the players' respective performances.
Deciding Set Performance: If the forthcoming match extends to a deciding set, it is pertinent to acknowledge the success rates of Yevseyev and Henning in such situations. Notably, Yevseyev has emerged victorious in 42% of their deciding sets over the past year. Comparatively, Henning has displayed a slightly higher success rate, winning 47% of their deciding sets in all matches played on the professional tour. These statistics are especially useful for individuals interested in live predictions and betting.
Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: Although historical player performance holds significant value in predicting tennis matches, once an event is underway, it becomes imperative to consider the current event statistics to gauge the form of the competitors. Therefore, a thorough examination of the current event statistics, which can be found in the below section, is vital. Additionally, it is crucial to acknowledge that certain players tend to deliver more impressive performances at specific events, which should be factored into the prediction process.
Break Point Conversion: In recent displays of skill, Yevseyev has successfully converted 45.49% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Henning has capitalized on 52.2% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. These numbers serve as paramount indicators for in-game live betting guidance whenever either player finds themselves presented with a breakpoint opportunity.
If your interest lies in models specialized in predicting tennis matches, you may find this article to be a valuable resource. However, it is worth noting that the content may be most appreciated by those engrossed in statistical intricacies.

Denis Yevseyev vs Philip Henning Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

D. Yevseyev vs P. Henning H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

D. Yevseyev	Stats	P. Henning
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	5
9	Aces (Total)	2
2	Total Double Faults	0
1:4:34	Average Match Time	1:4:34
68% (40/59)	1st Serve %	54% (26/48)
85% (34/40)	1st Serve Win %	62% (16/26)
37% (7/19)	2nd Serve Win %	41% (9/22)
75% (3/4)	Break Pts Won %	0% (0/4)
48% (23/48)	Return Points Win %	31% (18/59)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

D. Yevseyev Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Islamabad Challenger - 24-11-2025
SF Mert AlkayaM. Alkaya	L	6-7(7) 6-1 6-3	Stats
QF Johan NiklesJ. Nikles	W	4-6 6-1 6-3	Stats
R2 Muzammil MurtazaM. Murtaza	W	6-1 6-0	Stats
R1 Ivan GretskiyI. Gretskiy	W	7-6(7) 6-3	Stats
Soma Bay Challenger - 17-11-2025
R2 Jay ClarkeJ. Clarke	L	6-4 4-6 6-4	Stats

View All

P. Henning Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Athens Challenger - 24-11-2025
QF Sandro KoppS. Kopp	L	6-0 5-7 6-3	Stats
R2 James StoryJ. Story	W	7-6(1) 6-3	Stats
R1 Pierluigi BasileP. Basile	W	6-2 1-0 ret.	Stats
M25 Heraklion - 17-11-2025
F Ioannis XilasI. Xilas	W	6-4 7-5	Stats
SF Benjamin PietriB. Pietri	W	6-4 6-2	Stats

View All

D. Yevseyev vs P. Henning Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

D. Yevseyev	Stats	P. Henning
53.37% (483/422)	YTD Win/Loss	76.19% (128/40)
52.68% (1110/997)	Sets Win/Loss	72.22% (273/105)
51.00% (9892/9505)	Games Win/Loss	59.00% (2023/1406)
55.61% (238/190)	Hard Win/Loss	80.45% (107/26)
52.51% (157/142)	Clay Win/Loss	63.16% (12/7)
49.71% (86/87)	Indoor Hard W/L	56.25% (9/7)
40.00% (2/3)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.16	Aces Per Game	0.29
1559	Aces Total	479
0.18	Double Faults Per Game	0.11
1681	Total Double Faults	192
1:8:4	Average Match Time	1:31:26
549.62	Average Opponent Rank	413.18
66% (30960/46937)	1st Serve %	66% (6285/9565)
64% (19746/30960)	1st Serve Win %	71% (4463/6285)
48% (7614/15977)	2nd Serve Win %	57% (1857/3280)
45% (2392/5313)	Break Points Won % (Total)	47% (552/1187)
43% (20152/47415)	Return Points Win %	43% (4491/10380)
42.86% (3/4)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
50.00% (2/2)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
100.00% (1/0)	Cups W/L	20.00% (1/4)
33.33% (9/18)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
48.33% (188/201)	Challenger W/L	48.28% (14/15)
58.70% (280/197)	Futures W/L	84.33% (113/21)
54% (473/881)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	76% (128/168)
23% (3/13)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
54% (110/205)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	59% (26/44)
52% (153/295)	Deciding Set Win %	60% (25/42)
83% (478/397)	1st Set Won, Won Match	94% (121/114)
17% (478/81)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	6% (121/7)
20% (427/84)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	30% (47/14)