Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Denis Istomin vs Nathaniel Lammons Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Istomin vs Lammons analysis and find out who is favored!
Denis Istomin vs Nathaniel Lammons Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Istomin has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Lammons has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Istomin, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lammons has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Istomin has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lammons has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Istomin has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Lammons winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Istomin has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 273/ 185), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 104/ 122). Lammons has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 50/ 32), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Istomin has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Lammons has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Istomin winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Istomin winning 2 and Lammons winning 1. The last match between Istomin and Lammons was at the Cherbourg Challenger, 10-02-2021, First, I.hard with Denis Istomin getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:36:43.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Istomin and Lammons have played a deciding set 1 times, with Istomin winning 1 times and Lammons 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Istomin winning 0, and Lammons 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Istomin has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Lammons has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Istomin has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lammons has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Istomin has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lammons has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Istomin 1 - 0 Lammons
740
Rank
33
High
37
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
591
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
53% (585-516)
Career Total W/L
54% (78-67)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,029,610
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Denis Istomin | Nathaniel Lammons |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:43 | 1:36:43 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (60/91) | 67% (54/81) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (46/60) | 76% (41/54) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (17/31) | 44% (12/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 29% (2/7) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (28/81) | 31% (28/91) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 5-7 6-4 |
Stats 
Denis Istomin
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
28 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Denis Istomin | Nathaniel Lammons |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Denis Istomin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Arslanbek Aitkulov
Player
Denis Istomin
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francesco Forti
Player
Denis Istomin
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Denis Istomin
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
53%
(
57 of
107)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
101)
8
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
38%
(
19 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
43%
(
46 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
104
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Denis Istomin
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Denis Istomin
Player
Denis Yevseyev
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Denis Istomin
Player
Guilherme Valdoleiros
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve %
74%
(
35 of
47)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Denis Istomin
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Denis Istomin
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
82%
(
62 of
76)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
84%
(
41 of
49)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
15 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Denis Istomin
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nathaniel Lammons Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
18
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
52 of
61)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
31%
(
29 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
70%
(
87 of
124)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
107)
20
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
0
78%
(
68 of
87)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
52 of
71)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
37 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
32 of
107)
119
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(2) 6-7(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Istomin
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
28 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
54 of
73)
12
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Maxime Hamou
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ruan Roelofse
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
8
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
96%
(
23 of
24)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
22 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Istomin Vs Lammons Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
