Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Deborah Kerfs vs Julita Saner Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kerfs vs Saner analysis and find out who is favored!
Deborah Kerfs vs Julita Saner Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kerfs has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Saner has won 41.95%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kerfs, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Saner has won 54%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 45.45% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kerfs has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Saner has saved 41.05% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kerfs has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Saner winning 41.94% (W/L 13/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kerfs has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 124/ 111), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6). Saner has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 28/ 18), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 46/ 57).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kerfs winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kerfs winning 2 and Saner winning 0. The last match between Kerfs and Saner was at the Bastad, 17-05-2016, First, Clay with Deborah Kerfs getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kerfs and Saner have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kerfs winning 0 times and Saner 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kerfs winning 0, and Saner 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kerfs has played against opponents with an average rank of while Saner has played against players with an average rank of 112.16.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kerfs has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Saner has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kerfs has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Saner has converted 48.54% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kerfs 1 - 0 Saner
Ret.
Rank
442
High
29
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
869
Rank
763
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
52% (148-137)
Career Total W/L
48% (128-136)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
40% (2-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Deborah Kerfs | Julita Saner |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:11:0 | 1:11:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (33/54) | 57% (26/46) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (20/33) | 31% (8/26) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (9/21) | 25% (5/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 70% (7/10) | 75% (3/4) |
| Return Points W% | 72% (33/46) | 46% (25/54) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Deborah Kerfs
Player
Julita Saner
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
46%
(
25 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Deborah Kerfs | Julita Saner |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (7/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (72/58) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.12 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 68% (103/152) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 62% (64/103) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (23/49) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 43% (9/21) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (67/153) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Deborah Kerfs Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Emeline Dartron
Player
Deborah Kerfs
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandra Perper
Player
Deborah Kerfs
46%
(
26 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Costanza Traversi
Player
Deborah Kerfs
80%
(
74 of
92)
1st Serve %
69%
(
81 of
117)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
46 of
81)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
49%
(
45 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
55 of
117)
102
Total Points Won
107
|
1-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Deborah Kerfs
Player
Melania Delai
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
72 of
99)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
46%
(
38 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
0-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giada Clerici
Player
Deborah Kerfs
75%
(
68 of
91)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pemra Ozgen
Player
Deborah Kerfs
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Deborah Kerfs
Player
Dalila Spiteri
73%
(
58 of
80)
1st Serve %
69%
(
73 of
106)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
106)
102
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Chayenne Ewijk
Player
Deborah Kerfs
62%
(
66 of
107)
1st Serve %
49%
(
48 of
98)
4
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
7
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
40%
(
43 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
50 of
98)
114
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Deborah Kerfs
Player
Rosalie Van Der Hoek
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Julita Saner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 3-6 6-3 11-9 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kayo Nishimura
Player
Julita Saner
72%
(
70 of
97)
1st Serve %
72%
(
66 of
92)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
47%
(
46 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gaia Parravicini
Player
Julita Saner
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
57
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 1-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Zixuan Zeng
Player
Julita Saner
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
11
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
59%
(
10 of
17)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
49%
(
49 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
56 of
101)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Spigarelli
Player
Julita Saner
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
38 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Julita Saner
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julita Saner
Player
Sara Lanca
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
78%
(
47 of
60)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
3
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
27%
(
6 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
27 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julita Saner
Player
Ferdaous Bahri
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Kerfs Vs Saner Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
