Dea Herdzelas vs Tamara Curovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Herdzelas vs T. Curovic

Dea Herdzelas
BIH
l
l
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
28
Age
30
-
Height
-
841
C. Rank
809
183
Best Rank
394
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.9K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Tamara Curovic
SRB
l
l
l
l
l
l
w
w
l
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
28
Age
30
-
Height
-
841
C. Rank
809
183
Best Rank
394
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.9K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Herdzelas 0 - 0 Curovic
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Herdzelas | 0 |
Curovic | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
D. Herdzelas vs T. Curovic H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$1,950 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
59.74% (325-219) | Career Total W/L | 54.49% (376-314) |
9 | Titles | 8 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. Herdzelas vs T. Curovic Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Dea Herdzelas has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Tamara Curovic has won 41.54%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Dea Herdzelas, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tamara Curovic has won 48.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.29% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Dea Herdzelas has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tamara Curovic has saved 52.46% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Dea Herdzelas has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Tamara Curovic winning 40.00% (W/L 2/3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Dea Herdzelas has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 33/19), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Tamara Curovic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 234/193), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/3).
- Player level: In the last year, Dea Herdzelas has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Tamara Curovic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40.00% of matches (W/L 2/3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Dea Herdzelas has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Tamara Curovic has played against players with an average rank of 212.6.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Dea Herdzelas has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tamara Curovic has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Dea Herdzelas has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tamara Curovic has converted 55.56% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Dea Herdzelas vs Tamara Curovic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Herdzelas 0%, Curovic 43%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Herdzelas 0%, Curovic 50%.
Break Points Saved %: Herdzelas 0%, Curovic 48%.
D. Herdzelas Recent Matches Played
T. Curovic Recent Matches Played

D. Herdzelas vs T. Curovic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
59.74% (325/219) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.49% (376/314) |
57.65% (720/529) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.31% (844/710) |
53.81% (6075/5215) | Games Win/Loss | 52.28% (7274/6640) |
58.88% (63/44) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.57% (88/86) |
60.16% (225/149) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.80% (234/193) |
59.68% (37/25) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62.35% (53/32) |
0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 25.00% (1/3) |
0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
1012 | Aces Total | 707 |
0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.35 |
1324 | Total Double Faults | 2348 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:2:48 |
573.8 | Average Opponent Rank | 542.89 |
57% (12884/22745) | 1st Serve % | 58% (15378/26452) |
64% (8304/12884) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (9422/15378) |
44% (4330/9861) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (4743/11076) |
47% (1398/2961) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1744/3441) |
46% (10565/22794) | Return Points Win % | 48% (12299/25538) |
0.00% (0/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0.00% (0/6) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
20.00% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
56.52% (169/130) | Challenger W/L | 41.04% (87/125) |
67.69% (155/74) | Futures W/L | 60.59% (289/188) |
60% (319/529) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (372/671) |
50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
56% (59/105) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (54/116) |
57% (98/172) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (96/188) |
87% (322/280) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (379/330) |
13% (322/41) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (379/49) |
20% (222/44) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (310/47) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
05:00 PM 16/10/25
PredictionW1
1.3
W2
3.3
10:00 AM 16/10/25
PredictionW1
2.27
W2
1.58
01:00 PM 16/10/25
PredictionW1
1.26
W2
3.84
09:35 PM 15/10/25
PredictionW1
2.31
W2
1.61
05:00 PM 16/10/25
PredictionW1
1.74
W2
2.01
11:00 AM 16/10/25
PredictionW1
1.615
W2
2.3
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
Top Predictions Today
17:00
H2H 3-1
13:00
H2H 0-3
19:00
H2H 2-1
04:00
H2H 2-1
21:35
H2H 0-2
Tennis Events This Week
Almaty Open - Almaty
Kazakhstan
BNP Paribas Nordic Open - Stockholm
Sweden
European Open - Brussels
Belgium
Curitiba Challenger
Brazil
Hersonissos 6 Challenger
Greece
Lincoln Challenger
United States
Olbia Challenger
Italy
Shenzhen Challenger
China
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Kigali
Rwanda