Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Dea Herdzelas vs Lucija Ciric Bagaric Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Herdzelas vs Bagaric analysis and find out who is favored!
Dea Herdzelas vs Lucija Ciric Bagaric Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Herdzelas has won 38.73% of points on his second serve, while Bagaric has won 48.53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Herdzelas, in recent form, has won 56.19% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bagaric has won 60.8%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.7% and 44.29% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Herdzelas has saved 52.38% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bagaric has saved 56.45% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Herdzelas has won 46.67% of matches played (W/L 14/ 16), with Bagaric winning 73.24% (W/L 52/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Herdzelas has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 33/ 19), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Bagaric has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 77% (W/L 24/ 7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 68/ 36).
- Player level: In the last year, Herdzelas has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.28% of matches (W/L 14/ 15), where as Bagaric has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 73.24% of matches (W/L 52/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Herdzelas winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Herdzelas winning 2 and Bagaric winning 1. The last match between Herdzelas and Bagaric was at the W60 Zagreb, 25-04-2022, First, Clay with Dea Herdzelas getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:19:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Herdzelas and Bagaric have played a deciding set 1 times, with Herdzelas winning 1 times and Bagaric 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Herdzelas winning 0, and Bagaric 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Herdzelas has played against opponents with an average rank of 269.2 while Bagaric has played against players with an average rank of 305.04.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Herdzelas has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bagaric has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Herdzelas has converted 51.85% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bagaric has converted 52.15% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Herdzelas 1 - 0 Bagaric
635
Rank
183
High
27
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
185
Rank
185
High
20
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
60% (322-215)
Career Total W/L
68% (110-52)
20% (1-4)
YTD W/L
83% (25-5)
$1,950
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
4
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Dea Herdzelas | Lucija Ciric Bagaric |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:19:0 | 2:19:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (51/97) | 51% (56/110) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (35/51) | 55% (31/56) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (23/46) | 46% (25/54) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 41% (7/17) | 27% (4/15) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (54/110) | 40% (39/97) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Dea Herdzelas
Player
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
53%
(
51 of
97)
1st Serve %
51%
(
56 of
110)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
4
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
54 of
110)
112
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Dea Herdzelas | Lucija Ciric Bagaric |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 20% (1/4) | 83% (25/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 78% (51/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (40/48) | 62% (352/219) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 100% (8/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 77% (17/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 5 | 37 |
| DFs per game | 0.4 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 17 | 66 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:29:56 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 219.6 | 310.63 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (181/323) | 62% (1118/1791) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (116/181) | 63% (704/1118) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 39% (55/142) | 49% (329/673) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (14/27) | 54% (140/260) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (111/264) | 51% (893/1756) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 83% (25/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (1/4) | 82% (23/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 92% (25/23) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 8% (25/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 40% (5/2) |
Dea Herdzelas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Julia Middendorf
Player
Dea Herdzelas
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dea Herdzelas
Player
Maria Ivankovic
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
39%
(
16 of
41)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Shalimova
Player
Dea Herdzelas
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
21%
(
4 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
57%
(
34 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
68
Total Points Won
65
|
6-7(6) 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Khomutsianskaya
Player
Dea Herdzelas
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karola Patricia Bejenaru
Player
Dea Herdzelas
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
44%
(
31 of
71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
9
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Dea Herdzelas
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katharina Hobgarski
Player
Dea Herdzelas
78%
(
64 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
87
Total Points Won
70
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Dea Herdzelas
49%
(
46 of
94)
1st Serve %
44%
(
46 of
104)
1
Aces
4
12
Double Faults
4
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
42%
(
20 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
104)
100
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(3) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dea Herdzelas
Player
Vivian Wolff
55%
(
60 of
109)
1st Serve %
65%
(
68 of
105)
7
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
45%
(
22 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
39%
(
42 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
105)
112
Total Points Won
102
|
5-7 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Georgia Pedone
Player
Dea Herdzelas
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Lucija Ciric Bagaric Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
51%
(
39 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-0 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Oceane Dodin
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Panna Udvardy
Player
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Marina Stakusic
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Leyre Romero Gormaz
Player
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
59%
(
59 of
100)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
76)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
69%
(
63 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
69 of
113)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
45%
(
41 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
57 of
113)
107
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Lina Gjorcheska
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve %
52%
(
12 of
23)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
9 of
15)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
28
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Irene Burillo Escorihuela
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
12 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Herdzelas Vs Bagaric Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
