Prediction of David Pichler vs Muhammet Haylaz Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Pichler vs M. Haylaz

David Pichler
AUT
l
w
l
l
l
w
w
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
29
Age
30
5'10" (178 cm)
Height
-
873
C. Rank
Ret.
390
Best Rank
729
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Muhammet Haylaz
TUR
l
w
l
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
29
Age
30
5'10" (178 cm)
Height
-
873
C. Rank
Ret.
390
Best Rank
729
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Pichler 1 - 0 Haylaz
They have played 2 sets in total, with David Pichler winning 2 and Muhammet Haylaz winning 0. The last match between David Pichler and Muhammet Haylaz was at the Turkey F14, 05-04-2016, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with David Pichler getting the victory 6-2 7-6(4).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pichler | 1 |
| Haylaz | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Turkey F14(04-05-16)
David Pichler
6
7
Muhammet Haylaz
2
6
D. Pichler vs M. Haylaz H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.47% (355-285) | Career Total W/L | 41.01% (89-128) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. Pichler vs M. Haylaz Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), David Pichler has won 44.27% of points on their second serve, while Muhammet Haylaz has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show David Pichler, in recent form, has won 43.06% of their opponent's second serve points, while Muhammet Haylaz has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.17% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: David Pichler has saved 57.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Muhammet Haylaz has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year David Pichler has won 35.71% of matches played (W/L 5/9), with Muhammet Haylaz winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: David Pichler has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 122/88), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Muhammet Haylaz has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 3/2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 24% (W/L 9/28).
- Player level: In the last year, David Pichler has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 35.71% of matches (W/L 5/9), where as Muhammet Haylaz has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with David Pichler winning 1 times and Muhammet Haylaz being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with David Pichler winning 2 and Muhammet Haylaz winning 0.
- The last match between David Pichler and Muhammet Haylaz was at the Turkey F14, 05-04-2016, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with David Pichler getting the victory 6-2 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:52:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, David Pichler has played against opponents with an average rank of 395.93 while Muhammet Haylaz has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, David Pichler has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Muhammet Haylaz has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, David Pichler has converted 13.95% of breakpoint opportunities, and Muhammet Haylaz has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
David Pichler vs Muhammet Haylaz Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Pichler vs M. Haylaz H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:52:0 | Average Match Time | 1:52:0 |
| 55% (35/64) | 1st Serve % | 52% (48/93) |
| 89% (31/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (32/48) |
| 48% (14/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (18/45) |
| 23% (3/13) | Break Pts Won % | 14% (1/7) |
| 46% (43/93) | Return Points Win % | 30% (19/64) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Pichler 45%, Haylaz 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Pichler 46%, Haylaz 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Pichler 63%, Haylaz 0%.
D. Pichler Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-7(2) 6-3 7-5 | ||
Q1 | W | 7-6(3) 6-4 | ||
M. Haylaz Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||

D. Pichler vs M. Haylaz Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.47% (355/285) | YTD Win/Loss | 41.01% (89/128) |
| 55.37% (815/657) | Sets Win/Loss | 42.48% (209/283) |
| 52.44% (7121/6458) | Games Win/Loss | 46.88% (2131/2415) |
| 58.10% (122/88) | Hard Win/Loss | 44.00% (77/98) |
| 55.16% (203/165) | Clay Win/Loss | 24.32% (9/28) |
| 49.18% (30/31) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1822 | Aces Total | 361 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1128 | Total Double Faults | 478 |
| 1:32:30 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 546.23 | Average Opponent Rank | 450.38 |
| 60% (22762/37742) | 1st Serve % | 54% (3425/6338) |
| 68% (15404/22762) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (2319/3425) |
| 50% (7544/14979) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1296/2913) |
| 45% (1837/4048) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (221/563) |
| 41% (15911/38436) | Return Points Win % | 38% (2336/6148) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40.00% (40/60) | Challenger W/L | 20.00% (2/8) |
| 58.44% (315/224) | Futures W/L | 42.03% (87/120) |
| 55% (344/624) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 41% (88/216) |
| 67% (4/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (81/146) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (23/53) |
| 44% (87/196) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (27/59) |
| 83% (376/313) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (90/73) |
| 16% (376/62) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (90/17) |
| 16% (264/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (127/16) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction11:10 PM 17/11/25
Prediction06:30 AM 18/11/25
Prediction05:30 AM 18/11/25
Prediction03:30 AM 18/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
22:00
H2H 0-0
22:10
H2H 0-0
22:57
H2H 0-0
23:10
H2H 0-0
23:10
H2H 0-0